HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Billionaire divorce uncov... » Reply #1

Response to bucolic_frolic (Original post)

Thu May 7, 2020, 02:23 PM

1. Damn South Dakota, this stinks

"Initially, Marie was a beneficiary of the trusts, meaning she would receive income or benefits from the assets. But before their divorce, according to the lawsuit, Ed transferred the assets into new trusts that limited or shut out her interests. In keeping with South Dakota law, he was not required to notify her of the changes, according to the lawsuit."

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 5 replies Author Time Post
bucolic_frolic May 2020 OP
LineNew Reply Damn South Dakota, this stinks
MiniMe May 2020 #1
shanti May 2020 #2
Marrah_Goodman May 2020 #3
PufPuf23 May 2020 #4
BusyBeingBest May 2020 #5
Please login to view edit histories.