Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

MiniMe

(21,714 posts)

1. Damn South Dakota, this stinks

Reply to bucolic_frolic (Original post)

Thu May 7, 2020, 02:23 PM

May 2020

"Initially, Marie was a beneficiary of the trusts, meaning she would receive income or benefits from the assets. But before their divorce, according to the lawsuit, Ed transferred the assets into new trusts that limited or shut out her interests. In keeping with South Dakota law, he was not required to notify her of the changes, according to the lawsuit."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Billionaire divorce uncovers secretive world of trusts in South Dakota [View all] bucolic_frolic May 2020 OP

Damn South Dakota, this stinks MiniMe May 2020 #1

Obscene shanti May 2020 #2

That was the word that came to mind for me also Marrah_Goodman May 2020 #3

South Dakota a Favorite State for Credit Card Companies PufPuf23 May 2020 #4

Beret-wearing douchebag. Hope his company suffers from BusyBeingBest May 2020 #5