Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
34. He has already stated its a Senate Record or beyond if she filed.
Tue May 12, 2020, 02:10 AM
May 2020

and those papers are with the National Archives. They want to go fishing in his personal papers, speeches, etc.

Its not a record he would have if she filed a complaint, in fact a new system of filing a complaint was instituted in 1993. And it would have been passed along to the appropriate federal agency. Why wasn't she interviewed? Why weren't the employees in the office interviewed? Lots of questions, and she has no answers.

Subtitle D: Sexual Harassment - Sexual Harassment Prevention Act of 1993 - Directs employers (including Federal and congressional agencies) to keep posted in conspicuous places a notice prepared or approved by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission that sets forth: (1) the definition of sexual harassment found in the Code of Federal Regulations; (2) the fact that sexual harassment is a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; (3) information describing how to file a complaint with the Commission alleging such harassment; (4) an address and toll-free number to be used to contact the Commission; and (5) other information required by the Commission.

Is that the Trump guy or the Putin guy mcar May 2020 #1
That's the Trump donor. highplainsdem May 2020 #6
Go to hell tara reade, along with your attorney. still_one May 2020 #2
I agree tell them to go to hell Bev54 May 2020 #20
+++ still_one May 2020 #35
Here's a rolling donut, Mr. Wigdor gratuitous May 2020 #3
Damn right, refuse those assholes. GaYellowDawg May 2020 #4
What could possibly go wrong? mn9driver May 2020 #5
It's not "fishing" .. it's ******* Gaslighting. It's trying Cha May 2020 #7
Reminds me of the swift boating LakeVermilion May 2020 #11
Right.. Where are the Minors against trump's REAL Cha May 2020 #14
Exactly. guillaumeb May 2020 #12
+1. Disgusting dalton99a May 2020 #23
Is she changing het story again? I guess she doesn't realize that Arkansas Granny May 2020 #8
I'm done with her, her lies, her undoubted RW backing and even more so with the MSM enabling her hlthe2b May 2020 #9
Has she committed to a date this happened? R B Garr May 2020 #10
No Reade hasn't said when it was.. nor did she name Joe Biden Cha May 2020 #17
You too, Cha! Stay safe. Tara should be required to R B Garr May 2020 #21
The Hill is a Trump campaign organ greenjar_01 May 2020 #13
Bwahahahahahaaa spanone May 2020 #15
F$@k her. No way. bamagal62 May 2020 #16
if there is a complaint it is in the Senate archives he already asked to be searched Takket May 2020 #18
+1 She just wants to make the noises that get attention. nt crickets May 2020 #22
Grandstanding.. keeping Biden's name out there in her Cha May 2020 #25
Nope. Hard pass. n/t Alex4Martinez May 2020 #19
who? stillcool May 2020 #24
Nope. Too late and too close to the election. Freethinker65 May 2020 #26
With all due respect..PLEASE stop posting about this fanatic. Each time posted gives the story legs! Thekaspervote May 2020 #27
Thank you. Please let this story die. nt crickets May 2020 #30
This is all part of the attempt to steal this election . JI7 May 2020 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author crickets May 2020 #29
First off FUCK OFF. Deliver tRumps tax returns, after that rufus dog May 2020 #31
Mr.Wigdor, time for your client to kacekwl May 2020 #32
Sure. That's exactly what it's all about. nt Kahuna May 2020 #33
He has already stated its a Senate Record or beyond if she filed. Historic NY May 2020 #34
"Those bastards fired me, just for a bit of check-fraud! I'm getting even!" struggle4progress May 2020 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tara Reade's attorney ask...»Reply #34