Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Squinch

(50,901 posts)

9. I don't want to count any chickens...

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 12:04 PM

May 2020

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Judiciary are going to deliver a big time blow to this despicable monster [View all] malaise May 2020 OP

from your lips ..... demtenjeep May 2020 #1

Hopefully both SCOTUS and Judge Sullivan! leftieNanner May 2020 #2

When do you think we will hear from Judge Sullivan??? a kennedy May 2020 #21

If they don't CanonRay May 2020 #3

I hope so, because what I'm seeing Bettie May 2020 #4

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2020 #33

Luckily all Roberts has to do is go with judicial precedent from previous cases... cbdo2007 May 2020 #5

This is my hope. onecaliberal May 2020 #6

Yep malaise May 2020 #7

I love safeinOhio May 2020 #13

Petard, meet Hoist. OMGWTF May 2020 #40

Roberts isn't sounding like that. BComplex May 2020 #12

will they drop a nuclear weapon or can they push it into a black hole? mopinko May 2020 #8

I don't want to count any chickens... Squinch May 2020 #9

What info makes you think this? Nt USALiberal May 2020 #10

Listening to the oral arguments. kairos12 May 2020 #11

Breyer didn't dissent in Clinton v. Jones. onenote May 2020 #22

Thanks for the correction. kairos12 May 2020 #24

SCOTUS seems more concerned with PR than The Law these days. sop May 2020 #14

Perhaps, but... JHB May 2020 #15

So let it be written ornotna May 2020 #16

I sure hope you are right. panader0 May 2020 #17

I'm with the experts who suggested that a split decision is likely malaise May 2020 #29

That would be interesting Proud Liberal Dem May 2020 #34

I hope you are right. Jamastiene May 2020 #18

Blind faith. OneBro May 2020 #19

Regardless, they have been party over country 99% of the time since Gore v. Bush dalton99a May 2020 #20

Let's hope so but... Catherine Vincent May 2020 #23

Bingo CV DENVERPOPS May 2020 #26

I agree Auggie May 2020 #31

yes, sadly I agree as well. Tumbulu May 2020 #39

I like your optimism. SunSeeker May 2020 #25

his buddies will come through for him, the court is rigged. nt yaesu May 2020 #27

The conservative justices face a dilemma dlk May 2020 #28

It's worse than that malaise May 2020 #32

Yes, that is, no doubt, in the back of their minds dlk May 2020 #37

The President's Fee-Fees *shouldn't* be any sort of consideration Proud Liberal Dem May 2020 #36

It's the rage attack following the hurt "fee fees" that's the problem dlk May 2020 #38

Let's face it. The truth is so evil they can't tell us what it is. bucolic_frolic May 2020 #30

don't depend on this slimy SCOTUS zak247 May 2020 #35

Wanna' bet? Grins May 2020 #41

God willing with his/her thumb on the scale for truth benld74 May 2020 #42