Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's hope the Atlanta DA puts to rest the attempts here to justify the killing of Rayshard Brooks [View all]cayugafalls
(5,984 posts)18. Yes, there is new information. It was spelled out in the news conference.
You should not have had to see the news conference to understand that he should not have been fired upon, let alone SHOT IN THE BACK.
After he was shot in the back, the officer said "I got him". Then instead of rendering aid, which is required by the APD code, they waited 2 and 1/2 minutes while sitting on his back. Oh yea, he also went up to him and kicked him after he shot him IN THE BACK.
There is a code that says they are not supposed to shoot a taser, let alone their police gun, in a chase when the suspect is running with their back towards the officer.
Lots of things were done wrong. They murdered him. Pure and simple.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Let's hope the Atlanta DA puts to rest the attempts here to justify the killing of Rayshard Brooks [View all]
StarfishSaver
Jun 2020
OP
The fact that Rolfe was fired in less than 24 hours was the first indication to me
StarfishSaver
Jun 2020
#7
K&R, after the last 3 weeks some people still sound like that's how police are SUPPOSED to act
uponit7771
Jun 2020
#4
It is possible to miss things and not spend all your time reading on one incident...
TCJ70
Jun 2020
#19
I would think if you see an OP that clearly indicated a new development occurred,
StarfishSaver
Jun 2020
#22
Seems like you thought wrong. I asked a question, gave you where I'm at on the topic...
TCJ70
Jun 2020
#29
Thank you for outlining some of it. I didn't watch the conference or knew that there even was one.
TCJ70
Jun 2020
#28
The fact that you don't see a problem with him being shot in the back is telling
cayugafalls
Jun 2020
#46
Being ignorant isn't the problem. Jumping all up in this thread trying to start arguments
StarfishSaver
Jun 2020
#53
Well, there's something about the DA that may make him seem less reliable than the kind of DA some
StarfishSaver
Jun 2020
#50