Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NewsCenter28

(1,837 posts)
3. Except he will attempt to run straight to SCOTUS at 12:01 A.M. EDT, Wednesday, Nov 4, 2020
Tue Oct 27, 2020, 05:27 PM
Oct 2020

And get them to issue a nationwide injunction against any further ballot counting. Similar to what SCOTUS did in FL 2000. Counties busy counting votes until the hammer comes down and they were told that the counting was done as it was irreparably harming their boy, Dubya. The argument will be that any ballots that are counted past 12:01 are illegal. How they would do this is below from Wikipedia:

Authority
The relevant constitutional clause states:

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

Certain cases that have not been considered by a lower court may be heard by the Supreme Court in the first instance under what is termed original jurisdiction. The Supreme Court's authority in this respect is also derived from Article III of the Constitution, which states that the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction "in all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party." The original jurisdiction of the Court is set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1251. This statute provides that lower federal courts may also hear cases where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction,[2]:19–20 with the exception of disputes between two or more states. When a case is between two or more states, the Supreme Court holds both original and exclusive jurisdiction, and no lower court may hear such cases.

They can take a case without any lower judicial review, unfortunately.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

People keep trying to compare this to 2016. It's a ridiculous comparison. TwilightZone Oct 2020 #1
I've been saying the same thing. Turin_C3PO Oct 2020 #2
Except he will attempt to run straight to SCOTUS at 12:01 A.M. EDT, Wednesday, Nov 4, 2020 NewsCenter28 Oct 2020 #3
Good luck with that. CincyDem Oct 2020 #7
He will want to do that leftieNanner Oct 2020 #8
My fear would be that he gets the nationwide injunction against further counting of ballots after 12 NewsCenter28 Oct 2020 #12
That's not gonna happen, even Kavanaugh isn't against that sir pball Oct 2020 #18
NO, it's NOT "Similar to what SCOTUS did in FL" brooklynite Oct 2020 #11
I know the specifics of FL are not at all the same NewsCenter28 Oct 2020 #16
THEORETICALLY SCOTUS can do whatever they want sir pball Oct 2020 #20
We Hope to Hell NOT. Cha Oct 2020 #4
And if they try, Cha, the answer is to hit the streets NewsCenter28 Oct 2020 #5
I know.. We can't let them Steal Cha Oct 2020 #9
Yep that's for damn sure, Cha! NewsCenter28 Oct 2020 #10
I Agree, Sir The Magistrate Oct 2020 #6
In most states, the first ballots counted, and the first results to be released PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2020 #13
Oregon is 100% VBM leftieNanner Oct 2020 #15
Several other states do all vote by. PoindexterOglethorpe Oct 2020 #21
Great info leftieNanner Oct 2020 #22
Ya for sure, that's our way out of avoiding SCOTUS shenanigans and what I'm praying for-n/t NewsCenter28 Oct 2020 #17
K&R Blue Owl Oct 2020 #14
"The thing to watch is how smoothly vote counting goes and whether there are broad challenges ... mzmolly Oct 2020 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Election experts doubt Su...»Reply #3