Election experts doubt Supreme Court decides White House race

[NewsCenter28]

16. I know the specifics of FL are not at all the same

But the issue here is SCOTUS stealing an election.

Authority
The relevant constitutional clause states:

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

So, his legal beagles rush over to the SCOTUS at 12:01 a.m. on Wednesday, November 4, 2020, with lawsuits against all 50 states demanding an immediate nationwide injunction ending all further ballot counting immediately, and asking that SCOTUS order the Secretaries of State to certify the partial illegitimate results immediately in a case called theoretically 'Trump V. PA, et al." Further, they claim original jurisdiction mentioning "in which a state shall be the Party" grants them immediate hearing before SCOTUS. The brief they file claims that all the mail-in ballots are illegal and that the remedy is to toss all VBM ballots and that only in-person election day and early voting are constitutional. They will want to keep the in-person early voting results I'm pretty sure.

The Supreme Court, citing irreparable harm to Trump, grants a temporary injunction pending their further review ala 2000.

Can you tell me, for sure (other than citing some broad tropes about respecting the rule of law and societal norms, which Trump has smashed repeatedly), that that cannot, even theoretically happen. If so, I'll be super relieved and more than glad, ecstatic even, to stand down.