Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Stallion

(6,473 posts)

3. That's an Impermissible Legal Conclusion w/o Factual Support

Reply to Srkdqltr (Reply #1)

Mon Nov 9, 2020, 01:43 PM

Nov 2020

that's 2 reasons it constitutes "No evidence" under the law

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's campaign presented 'hearsay written on a sticky note' in court as evidence of voter fraud [View all] Wicked Blue Nov 2020 OP

And what did the note say was improper? Srkdqltr Nov 2020 #1

The Votes Weren't For PINO ProfessorGAC Nov 2020 #2

That's an Impermissible Legal Conclusion w/o Factual Support Stallion Nov 2020 #3

It means they made the whole thing up al bupp Nov 2020 #4

These challenges should be considered frivilous and sanctions applied against the attorneys dumb usajumpedtheshark Nov 2020 #5

Absolutely Srkdqltr Nov 2020 #6

Where did these lawyers get their law degrees? onetexan Nov 2020 #7

I once went up against a prosecutor qazplm135 Nov 2020 #8

Trump University nt Wicked Blue Nov 2020 #9

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's campaign presente...»Reply #3