Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

usajumpedtheshark

(672 posts)

5. These challenges should be considered frivilous and sanctions applied against the attorneys dumb

Reply to Wicked Blue (Original post)

Mon Nov 9, 2020, 01:48 PM

Nov 2020

enough to present them in court. I believe the attorneys have to certify that they have conducted the necessary due diligence to establish legitimate legal or factual evidence to back up their lawsuits. Penalties can be applied against the attorney as well as their law firm and include the possibility of being held in contempt of court.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's campaign presented 'hearsay written on a sticky note' in court as evidence of voter fraud [View all] Wicked Blue Nov 2020 OP

And what did the note say was improper? Srkdqltr Nov 2020 #1

The Votes Weren't For PINO ProfessorGAC Nov 2020 #2

That's an Impermissible Legal Conclusion w/o Factual Support Stallion Nov 2020 #3

It means they made the whole thing up al bupp Nov 2020 #4

These challenges should be considered frivilous and sanctions applied against the attorneys dumb usajumpedtheshark Nov 2020 #5

Absolutely Srkdqltr Nov 2020 #6

Where did these lawyers get their law degrees? onetexan Nov 2020 #7

I once went up against a prosecutor qazplm135 Nov 2020 #8

Trump University nt Wicked Blue Nov 2020 #9