Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Question... [View all]

pat_k

(12,612 posts)
2. I don't think "day prescribed by law" . . .
Sat Nov 21, 2020, 02:08 AM
Nov 2020

. . .is the deadline a state sets itself for certification. Recounts and audits can occur after certification. If a legislature "short circuits" the process and intervenes to appoint electors to the loser of the state's vote, then it is up to Congress to toss those electors out as unlawfully appointed on Jan 6.

When the Supreme Court intervened and called the incomplete 2000 election in Florida for Bush on Dec 12, 2000 they rendered the appointment of the electors unlawful (appointed pursuant to an incomplete election as per Florida law). Gore should not have conceded. He and the Democratic caucuses in the House and Senate should have educated the public and fought to toss the unlawfully appointed electors out on Jan 6, 2001. (Pretty much as Justice Bryer instructed them to in his dissent.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question...»Reply #2