Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

crickets

(25,952 posts)
18. Boeing OC-135B
Fri Dec 18, 2020, 05:55 PM
Dec 2020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_OC-135B_Open_Skies

The OC-135B Open Skies United States Air Force observation aircraft supports the Treaty on Open Skies.[1] The aircraft, a modified WC-135B, flies unarmed observation flights over participating parties of the treaty. Three OC-135B aircraft were modified by the Aeronautical Systems Center's 4950th Test Wing at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio. The first operationally-capable OC-135B was assigned to the 24th Reconnaissance Squadron at Offutt AFB in October 1993. It is now fitted with a basic set of navigational and sensor equipment, and was placed in inviolate storage at the Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Center at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base near Tucson, Arizona in 1997. Two fully operational OC-135B aircraft were delivered in 1996 with the full complement of treaty-allowed sensors, which includes an infrared line scanner, synthetic aperture radar and video scanning sensors.



Keep American Skies Open to Russia: The Trump administration is poised to kill another useful treaty that contributes to trans-Atlantic peace (interesting op-ed about how the treaty came about and why we should keep it)
https://newrepublic.com/article/155583/keep-american-open-skies-trump-russia

But the biggest value of the Open Skies Treaty to the U.S., and the world, is its boost to confidence-building and transparency. By rule, American personnel sit in on Russian Open Skies flights, and vice versa. Treaty opponents say the widespread availability of high-resolution satellite imagery moots the accord, but most Open Skies members don’t have their own constellation of bespoke satellites, like the one Trump outed a few weeks ago by tweeting a highly classified Iran surveillance photo it had taken. Even if the U.S. could rely fully on its advanced space-based imagery sensors, the other 32 non-Russia Open Skies members gain tremendously from the treaty’s sharing process.

The Open Skies Treaty is not without its warts or disputes. The Obama administration locked horns with Moscow over Russia’s compliance and bad-faith challenges to U.S. operations under the accord. But those disputes were largely resolved in open multilateral discussions, and the lingering challenges aren’t fixed by steamrolling an unprecedented military-transparency regime, Bolton-style. The fact is that the Open Skies concept, and its application in recent years, vindicates “the continued relevance of arms control for our national security,” as one State Department official put it in 2014.



The Importance of the Open Skies Treaty - Nov 2019
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110262/witnesses/HHRG-116-FA14-Wstate-WoolfA-20191119.pdf

Foreign Affairs hearing re the allowed planes/equipment; includes the usual Congressional bellyaching about costs.
What's special about Russia that only certain type(s) of aircraft can be used for this purpose? mr_lebowski Dec 2020 #1
Special International Agreement The3rdTimeIsCharmed Dec 2020 #6
Didn't Trump also get rid of the agreement ... thought I saw ... no reciprocal fly-overs? mr_lebowski Dec 2020 #15
What planes are those. Couldn't find in it marybourg Dec 2020 #2
boeing planes made in the 60s or 70s..there was something about them a few months back... samnsara Dec 2020 #4
I wonder why this was posted today. Or at all. marybourg Dec 2020 #5
TRMS reported on it about a month ago. maxsolomon Dec 2020 #7
Well, that clears things up. marybourg Dec 2020 #8
Here is a link. maxsolomon Dec 2020 #9
Thank you. Although I wasn't allowed to read marybourg Dec 2020 #13
U.S. officially withdrew from Open Skies Treaty 22 November Brother Buzz Dec 2020 #12
Recent Pentagon News Suppression The3rdTimeIsCharmed Dec 2020 #14
Boeing OC-135B crickets Dec 2020 #18
He is trying to give Putin everything he wants to stay in his good graces.... kentuck Dec 2020 #3
I still think a dacha on the Crimean coast is still a Trump "retirement" option... Wounded Bear Dec 2020 #11
And is looking for an asylum route! Maybe Snowden has an extra bunk bed. n/t RKP5637 Dec 2020 #17
Everything Don has been doing is being done for Vlad. sarcasmo Dec 2020 #10
of course bdamomma Dec 2020 #25
More orders from Putin for tRump's get out of some debt card, most likely! n/t RKP5637 Dec 2020 #16
I don't think the Air Force would have much trouble procuring a... EX500rider Dec 2020 #19
If the treaty is torn up, a new plane would not be authorized. BUT relying on satellites is risky! The3rdTimeIsCharmed Dec 2020 #21
Well if it comes to shooting down sats, the planes would not be flying either. EX500rider Dec 2020 #26
I can't help but laugh sarisataka Dec 2020 #20
What the post ACTUALLY said (and implied) The3rdTimeIsCharmed Dec 2020 #22
I would suggest planes such as sarisataka Dec 2020 #23
Thank you, The3rdTimeIsCharmed. First I've ever heard of this. Very helpful. ⭐️ Judi Lynn Dec 2020 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dismantling the ONLY airp...»Reply #18