Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: David Paleologos (Suffolk U) latest VA poll shows Obama +2, announces "unwinnable for Obama" [View all]flamingdem
(39,312 posts)8. He said this on FOX
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/10/1142453/-WTF-Suffolk-U-Pollster-Commits-Professional-Malpractice
So this presumptuous little fellow made his grand sweeping pronouncement while interviewing with none other than the grand master bloviator himself, Bill O'Reilly. Here is the transcript in full:
O'Reilly: [Asks a question about other states, such as Pennsylvania, Iowa, Nevada, etc]
Paleologos: ...I think In places like North Carolina, Florida, Virginia - we've already painted those red. We're not polling any of those states again. We're focusing on the remaining states--
O'Reilly: That's interesting. Let me stop you there. So you're convinced - your polling ageny is convinced - that Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia are going to go for Romney?
Paleologos: That's right, and here's why. Before the debate the Suffolk Poll had Obama winning 46-43 in the head to head number - a poor place to be for a couple of reasons. Number 1, his ballot test, his head to head number, was under 47 before the debate. And it's very difficult when you have the known quantity, the incumbent, to claw your way up to 50. So that was a very very poor place for him to be. And so we're looking at this polling data not only in Florida, but in Virginia and in North Carolina, and it's overwhelming.
more at link
So this presumptuous little fellow made his grand sweeping pronouncement while interviewing with none other than the grand master bloviator himself, Bill O'Reilly. Here is the transcript in full:
O'Reilly: [Asks a question about other states, such as Pennsylvania, Iowa, Nevada, etc]
Paleologos: ...I think In places like North Carolina, Florida, Virginia - we've already painted those red. We're not polling any of those states again. We're focusing on the remaining states--
O'Reilly: That's interesting. Let me stop you there. So you're convinced - your polling ageny is convinced - that Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia are going to go for Romney?
Paleologos: That's right, and here's why. Before the debate the Suffolk Poll had Obama winning 46-43 in the head to head number - a poor place to be for a couple of reasons. Number 1, his ballot test, his head to head number, was under 47 before the debate. And it's very difficult when you have the known quantity, the incumbent, to claw your way up to 50. So that was a very very poor place for him to be. And so we're looking at this polling data not only in Florida, but in Virginia and in North Carolina, and it's overwhelming.
more at link
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
32 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
David Paleologos (Suffolk U) latest VA poll shows Obama +2, announces "unwinnable for Obama" [View all]
grantcart
Oct 2012
OP
Let's see if he or his company are named in the criminal investigation of...
porphyrian
Oct 2012
#20