Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TwilightZone

(25,456 posts)

8. I didn't say I believed otherwise. I provided you with context.

Reply to hlthe2b (Reply #6)

Sat Mar 13, 2021, 07:40 PM

Mar 2021

In recent years, he's gone from roughly bottom 10 to, as I clearly noted, mid-pack -- in the low/high 20s. I don't recall seeing any poll indicating that he was one of the best, scholarly or otherwise.

The National Review is decidedly right-wing, by the way.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Some questions to consider about the ...Worst President of the U.S.A. [View all] Stuart G Mar 2021 OP

In the end, deaths per capita will be the yardstick by which nations are compared Shermann Mar 2021 #1

Lumping Grant in with Johnson is sooooo wrong. His drinking aside, he was not at all one of our hlthe2b Mar 2021 #2

Including FDR with the others is laughable. TwilightZone Mar 2021 #5

The major historians have systematically reassessed Grant in recent decades. No, he is NOT hlthe2b Mar 2021 #6

I didn't say I believed otherwise. I provided you with context. TwilightZone Mar 2021 #8

I know about TNR, but this was a good assessment without a paywall. hlthe2b Mar 2021 #9

William Henry Harrison? dpibel Mar 2021 #10

trump is making one ex-POTUS happy LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2021 #3

You can't possibly be lumping FDR in with the others. TwilightZone Mar 2021 #4

Monday Morning QB'ing is silly WarGamer Mar 2021 #7