Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)
19. I'd argue that this one is fairly routine too
Mon Jun 7, 2021, 01:17 PM
Jun 2021

Oral arguments were pretty dry. Only one justice even brought up the many tens of thousands of people that would be impacted.

IMO - Once it was clear that Chevron was in no danger... the case ceased to carry much weight.

Two posts, two drastically different headlines underpants Jun 2021 #1
Breaking news vs gd? soothsayer Jun 2021 #2
I just don't know what the ruling was. underpants Jun 2021 #4
They look the same to me FBaggins Jun 2021 #5
They look the same to me muriel_volestrangler Jun 2021 #10
From the Syllabus Klaralven Jun 2021 #3
Heckuva complex syllabus! elleng Jun 2021 #7
9-0 is a rarity StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #6
According to the Washington Post gladium et scutum Jun 2021 #8
That's just last OT - it's usually higher. FBaggins Jun 2021 #17
Thanks n/t gladium et scutum Jun 2021 #20
Not really.. Zeitghost Jun 2021 #11
Posters here will still argue that every upcoming SC decision will be decided along partisan lines MichMan Jun 2021 #15
You will be proven right! oldsoftie Jun 2021 #21
I should have been more specific StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #18
They had something like 5 opinions in a row last month that were all unanimous. Calista241 Jun 2021 #12
I assume 9-0 to mean agreement on a compelling legal or practical issue. Hortensis Jun 2021 #13
Yes StarfishSaver Jun 2021 #16
I'd argue that this one is fairly routine too FBaggins Jun 2021 #19
Ugly. WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2021 #9
The crux: ScratchCat Jun 2021 #14
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS rules 9-0 against ...»Reply #19