Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Court overturns Bill Cosby's conviction and bars future prosecution [View all]Takket
(21,528 posts)33. Wait... this says the PSC says
The trial judge had allowed just one other accuser to testify at Cosbys first trial, when the jury deadlocked. However, he then allowed five other accusers to testify at the retrial about their experiences with Cosby in the 1980s.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said that testimony tainted the trial, even though a lower appeals court had found it appropriate to show a signature pattern of drugging and molesting women.
But others are saying he was let go because of the deal with the prosecutor. So which is it?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
An agreement with a previous prosecutor that he wouldn't be charged is the reason.
Drunken Irishman
Jun 2021
#4
Why was this not raised during the original trial that he had an agreement with the
madinmaryland
Jun 2021
#19
I am wondering what the hell that previous prosecutor was trying to accomplish.
lagomorph777
Jun 2021
#16
Nobody. Sounds like a previous prosecutor made a massive, massive mistake.
bearsfootball516
Jun 2021
#10
This sucks. But at least he did some time, and the whole world knows he's guilty
fishwax
Jun 2021
#20
Of course, once again, a Repuke is at the center of a perversion of justice.
clementine613
Jun 2021
#39