Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lastlib

(28,654 posts)
15. "Missouri Plan"--"non-partisan" selection method.
Thu Jul 15, 2021, 11:34 PM
Jul 2021

Under this plan, first used in my home state, a "non-partisan" commission examines candidates for a judgeship, and submits three nominees to the governor. Governor picks one who is then confirmed by the state Senate for a term. At the end of that term, the judge files for retention, which is submitted for a referendum, the question being "Shall Judge 'Jones' of the nth Circuit be retained in office?" He is retained for another term if the majority vote is "yes;" if the vote is "no," he must step down and the process is repeated.

Supposedly, it takes politics out of the process, but that's not the reality. The judges themselves cannot conduct campaigns on their behalf, but political parties often do it for them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»how come are some judges ...»Reply #15