Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(81,444 posts)
16. +1. Excellent book
Sat Jul 31, 2021, 05:24 PM
Jul 2021
...

My “brothers” were members of a very peculiar group of believers, not representative of the majority of Christians but of an avant-garde of the social movement I call American fundamentalism, a movement that recasts theology in the language of empire. Avant-garde is a term usually reserved for innovators, artists who live strange and dangerous lives and translate their strange and dangerous thoughts into pictures or poetry or fantastical buildings. The term has a political ancestry as well: Lenin used it to describe the elite cadres he believed could spark a revolution. It is in this sense that the men to whom my brothers apprenticed themselves, a seventy-year-old self-described “invisible” network of followers of Christ in government, business, and the military, use the term avant-garde. They call themselves “the Family,” or “The Fellowship,” and they consider themselves a “core” of men responsible for changing the world. “Hitler, Lenin, and many others understood the power of a small core of people,” instructs a document given to an inner circle, explaining the scope, if not the ideological particulars, of the ambition members of this avant-garde are to cultivate.1 Or, as a former Ivanwald brother who’d used his Ivanwald connections to find a foothold in the insurance industry told my brothers and me during a seminar on “biblical capitalism,” “Look at it like this: take a bunch of sticks, light each one of ’em on fire. Separate, they go out. Put ’em together, though, and light the bundle. Now you’re ready to burn.”

Hitler, to the Family, is no more real than Attila the Hun as drafted by business gurus who promise unstoppable “leadership” techniques drawn from history’s killers; or for that matter Christ, himself, as rendered in a business best seller called Jesus, CEO. The Family’s avant-garde is not composed of neo-Nazis, or crypto-Nazis, or fascists by any traditional definition; they are fundamentalists, and in this still-secular age, fundamentalism is a religion of both affluence and revolution.

...

The more I learned about the Family, the more difficulty I had in classifying its theology. It is Protestant, to be sure, though there are Catholic members. Its leadership regards with disdain not only the mainline denominations, but also evangelicals they consider “lukewarm.” And yet they distance themselves from the bullying of televangelists and moral scolds as well, in part because of theological differences (Jesus, they believe, instructs them to cultivate the powerful regardless of their doctrinal purity) and in part based on style (the Family believes in a subtler evangelism). “They take the same approach to religion that Ronald Reagan took to economics,” says a Senate staffer named Neil MacBride, a political liberal with conservative evangelical convictions that put him at odds with the Family’s unorthodox fundamentalism. “Reach the elite, and the blessings will trickle down to the underlings.”

...

But at Ivanwald, or in a prayer cell at the Cedars, or in conversations with world leaders, the Family’s beliefs appear closer to a more marginal set of theologies sometimes gathered under the umbrella term of dominionism, characterized for me by William Martin, a religious historian at Rice University and Billy Graham’s official biographer, as the “intellectual heart of the Christian Right.” Dominionist theologies hold the Bible to be a guide to every decision, high and low, from whom God wants you to marry to whether God thinks you should buy a new lawn mower. Unlike neo-evangelicals, who concern themselves chiefly with getting good with Jesus, dominionists want to reconstruct early Christian society, which they believe was ruled by God alone. They view themselves as the new chosen and claim a Christian doctrine of covenantalism, meaning covenants not only between God and humanity but at every level of society, replacing the rule of law and its secular contracts. Since these covenants are signed, as it were, in the Blood of the Lamb, they are written in ink invisible to nonbelievers.

...
On White Evangelical Protestants [View all] The Magistrate Jul 2021 OP
Large, organized religions tend to embrace authoritarianism...nt Wounded Bear Jul 2021 #1
Of course. They are socio-political control mechanisms. SheltieLover Jul 2021 #5
And generally very hierarchical in organization... Wounded Bear Jul 2021 #7
Absolutely! SheltieLover Jul 2021 #10
That's why it is so hard to have an intelligent discussion with them. erronis Jul 2021 #2
That's right! MayReasonRule Feb 2023 #48
Sarah Vowell's amazing cbabe Jul 2021 #3
I don't know, plimsoll Jul 2021 #22
If these freaks are in heaven, send me to hell. roamer65 Jul 2021 #4
Just keep them away from me malaise Jul 2021 #40
U and I will stick together. roamer65 Jul 2021 #41
Yes malaise Jul 2021 #42
They can spin it however they want. It's code for racism..whites only PortTack Jul 2021 #6
K & R Nevilledog Jul 2021 #8
I figured out why they are having shit fits cilla4progress Jul 2021 #9
This is true of conservatives generally Jilly_in_VA Jul 2021 #12
Absolutely. cilla4progress Jul 2021 #39
Good editorial, and one of those rare times when reading the comments pays off. crickets Jul 2021 #11
+1 plimsoll Jul 2021 #24
Exactly, the christofascists have been working toward a christian theocracy since Reagan. Thomas Hurt Jul 2021 #13
True also of Dominionists, who are mostly Catholic Alice Kramden Jul 2021 #14
True! And going back more than a century! Grins Jul 2021 #15
+1. Excellent book dalton99a Jul 2021 #16
Son's of Jacob? paleotn Jul 2021 #19
Invisible ink. Just like their invisible god. lindysalsagal Jul 2021 #43
+1000000, required reading for anyone wondering what is really going on today. cayugafalls Jul 2021 #23
Yes, read it way back then.. mountain grammy Jul 2021 #33
I once heard the uber jackass, James Dobson, paleotn Jul 2021 #17
They may be chosen, but not by God. patphil Jul 2021 #18
What will they say/do when it is not their version of Christianity in charge? keithbvadu2 Jul 2021 #20
From a white Evangelical protestant lees1975 Jul 2021 #21
Not Bad, Sir The Magistrate Jul 2021 #27
Wow! mountain grammy Jul 2021 #31
Frank Zappa despised televangelists 90-percent Jul 2021 #25
I love Frank Zappa. Elessar Zappa Jul 2021 #44
frank 90-percent Aug 2021 #47
Absolutely true.. mountain grammy Jul 2021 #26
As I sit here, hubby's reading a book that's making his hair stand on end... Hekate Jul 2021 #28
religion & politics don't f@$king mix ! - like water & oil !!! monkeyman1 Jul 2021 #29
Of course. Didn't everyone know this? NanananaFatman Jul 2021 #30
A departure from the history of the evangelical denominations to whom we owe the 1st Amendment. TygrBright Jul 2021 #32
At Times, Ma'am The Magistrate Jul 2021 #34
It's entirely possible. On the other hand, given our incredibly strong cultural support... TygrBright Jul 2021 #36
Interesting theory. Elessar Zappa Jul 2021 #45
The difference is that the basic doctrines of those colonial "Evangelicals" has changed lees1975 Jul 2021 #46
I think they should be randomly crucified, one in ten thousand annually... hunter Jul 2021 #35
roflmaoooooo Celerity Jul 2021 #38
I am glad they are a shrinking minority Blue Owl Jul 2021 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On White Evangelical Prot...»Reply #16