Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)
8. I see two key challenges in the current lawsuit
Fri Sep 10, 2021, 11:42 AM
Sep 2021

Clinics couldn't sue the state of Texas, but the federal government can if they can establish standing. And, of course, finding someone to sue.

That second one is (on my first reading) the tougher challenge. Making a hypothetical future person an agent of the state will make for some interesting arguments.

But standing is clearly a question mark as well (as the article notes). One of the two standing arguments is (in CNN's description):

"that the Texas ban is imposing harm on the federal personnel whose duties include securing abortion access for people in the federal government's care, because the Texas law exposes those personnel to private SB8 enforcement litigation if they help a woman obtain an abortion after six weeks."


Just a week or two ago, DOJ announced that they were sending people in to enforce FACE (a different conversation can be held on whether or not that really applies here). I think that earlier move helps establish the claim.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Problems the DOJ face...»Reply #8