Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search


(3,015 posts)
25. You're out of your element
Tue Sep 14, 2021, 10:36 PM
Sep 2021

Do you truly believe that no prosecutor brings a charge unless it's slam-dunk given?

I hope it is #1. I honestly don't have a sense but I do think Garland would be strategic. hlthe2b Sep 2021 #1
I'll credit our media for keeping the pressure, off. ShazamIam Sep 2021 #2
You're saying Garland needs to be pressured? brooklynite Sep 2021 #3
No, I mean if the media pressured, the DOJ would have been on a hiring spree; immediately after the ShazamIam Sep 2021 #4
"the DOJ would have been on a hiring spree" brooklynite Sep 2021 #5
I'm only basing it on my near instant recollection of the crimes of the Trump administration. Of ShazamIam Sep 2021 #7
"my near instant recollection of the crimes of the Trump administration" brooklynite Sep 2021 #9
I don't know. What do you think, is it projection? ShazamIam Sep 2021 #13
WTF knows Historic NY Sep 2021 #6
What is your answer? dpibel Sep 2021 #8
As stated before, I'm comfortable that indictments will be forthcoming when there's a case... brooklynite Sep 2021 #10
So safe with all outcomes! dpibel Sep 2021 #11
"And if they don't, there wasn't a case!" brooklynite Sep 2021 #12
Fascinating dpibel Sep 2021 #14
Can I distinguish between the two cases? Yes. brooklynite Sep 2021 #15
Oh, my dpibel Sep 2021 #17
Of course I understand prosecutorial discretion. Provide evidence that it's occurring. brooklynite Sep 2021 #19
"Provide evidence that it's occurring"?? dpibel Sep 2021 #23
The difference is that my assessment doesn't then require an assumption that..... brooklynite Sep 2021 #26
Well, gosh dpibel Sep 2021 #29
"Here in America, we don't ever prosecute former presidents, regardless of the facts." brooklynite Sep 2021 #33
That's one of the oddest things I've ever read dpibel Sep 2021 #37
The POINT is that YOU'RE jumping to: "the AG has chosen not to prosecute" brooklynite Sep 2021 #40
I'm sticking with dpibel Sep 2021 #43
This poll is absolutely biased. And isn't intended to reveal facts... brooklynite Sep 2021 #45
Duly asked dpibel Sep 2021 #46
I didn't vote for Johnson (because I was 5) brooklynite Sep 2021 #47
Well, OK. I accept your concession. dpibel Sep 2021 #48
Of course being a Democrat doesn't equate to being ethical... brooklynite Sep 2021 #49
Prove your unicorns! dpibel Sep 2021 #50
The Georgia state prosecutor isn't even close to being in the same category as Merrick Garland StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #35
I'm sorry that you don't understand dpibel Sep 2021 #44
Michael Cohen served time for campaign finance violations gab13by13 Sep 2021 #16
Okay, let's parse this... brooklynite Sep 2021 #18
Given what Cohen has said dpibel Sep 2021 #20
"What do you figger the prosecutor's doubt is based on?" brooklynite Sep 2021 #21
You're out of your element dpibel Sep 2021 #25
Same reason Jesus hasn't come back yet Effete Snob Sep 2021 #22
"They" might be "you" but it's not "us" questionseverything Sep 2021 #24
So President Obama and his Attorney General wasn't "us" either? This is getting confusing. brooklynite Sep 2021 #27
It really shouldn't be dpibel Sep 2021 #31
You can criticize his POLICIES all you want... brooklynite Sep 2021 #34
The evidence is all over c span this morning questionseverything Sep 2021 #51
If there is a prosecution iemanja Sep 2021 #28
It's going to be hard to make a case against Trump. Calista241 Sep 2021 #30
Exactly LeftInTX Sep 2021 #38
It will be hard to prove a case against him, but testimony about anything he said is not necessarily StarfishSaver Sep 2021 #42
They never went after Bush Co. Johonny Sep 2021 #32
The cases against Bush were much more complex. The shitbeast is more of a blatant criminal. LymphocyteLover Sep 2021 #36
I disagree Johonny Sep 2021 #39
I agree the torture was a clear cut case for an international court but it was never going to be LymphocyteLover Sep 2021 #52
Doubt DOJ has trump high on their list at this time. Hoyt Sep 2021 #41
Trump is rich and powerful AZProgressive Sep 2021 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll: What is the reason ...»Reply #25