Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Amishman

(5,555 posts)
15. even the weapons charges are a complicated issue
Mon Nov 8, 2021, 04:13 PM
Nov 2021

Last edited Mon Nov 8, 2021, 04:59 PM - Edit history (1)

Wisconsin statute 948.60 is a clumsy law due to how it was written and amended.

The original law 948.60 (2) is pretty clear

Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.


Years later it was weakened by 948.60 (3) which are several exceptions to this. (3) (c) says this

This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.


941.28 prohibits short barreled rifles and shotguns, which Rittenhouse's gun was not. 29.304 and 29.593 are both about hunting and not relevant.

The defense tried to have this charged tossed pre-trial, but the judge said the law is unclear and would leave it up to the jury.
Agreed Devil Child Nov 2021 #1
I'm not sure this case will survive a motion to dismiss. n/t Calista241 Nov 2021 #2
At this point, me neither. DetroitLegalBeagle Nov 2021 #12
There were three people shot, two are dead, this only covers the one that lived... Thomas Hurt Nov 2021 #3
Nope. Dr. Strange Nov 2021 #4
No, but Sympthsical Nov 2021 #6
And the 2nd person shot doesn't matter, eh Symp? blm Nov 2021 #9
Everyone involved matters, but the law does, too. Sympthsical Nov 2021 #13
even the weapons charges are a complicated issue Amishman Nov 2021 #15
agreed, too much video that backs the defense Amishman Nov 2021 #11
The prosecution never wanted to win this case. Mugu Nov 2021 #5
Right wing white boy Bettie Nov 2021 #7
That's Not A Fair RobinA Nov 2021 #17
We shouldn't start that Sympthsical Nov 2021 #8
He sure did. jcmaine72 Nov 2021 #23
Yep, listened to the until they went on lunch DetroitLegalBeagle Nov 2021 #10
You know his civil attorney had words during lunch Sympthsical Nov 2021 #14
Jeez. No wonder prosecution took forever to bring this to trial. Hoyt Nov 2021 #16
Bad case manicdem Nov 2021 #18
I knew the punk would walk MustLoveBeagles Nov 2021 #19
Post removed Post removed Nov 2021 #24
lol BumRushDaShow Nov 2021 #25
I missed the poo flinging 💩 MustLoveBeagles Nov 2021 #26
It was some stinky RW loon stuff too BumRushDaShow Nov 2021 #27
I haven't followed it but I read in a CNN article that the Tomconroy Nov 2021 #20
I'll wait until it's over Torchlight Nov 2021 #21
I didn't invest anything in it. I assumed he shot people and there Tomconroy Nov 2021 #22
Wow! Patton French Nov 2021 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The murder portion of the...»Reply #15