General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I've seen very little of the Rittenhouse trial. I have a question. [View all]Decoy of Fenris
(1,954 posts)He was shot in the hand and body at a distance and angle consistent with the defense's testimony. The wounds also match the ballistic profile for the ammunition used fired from the gun involved. Forensic analysis backed up the Defense in every count and for every shooting, but that's patently obvious to anyone with even the most elementary and rudimentary understanding of trajectory, geometry or ballistic physics (You only need one, take your pick and read up).
Look, I get it, we want this guy to get whacked for being a piece of shit, which he is, but facts don't lie and I'm not a fan of peddling dishonest propaganda. And if you were watching "Live on Court TV", may I suggest you spring for a Tivo (or whatever obsolete tech they use nowadays) to watch it again? The coroner obliterated the prosecution on every count; The defense couldn't have asked for or paid for for a better testimony.