Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

sarisataka

(18,600 posts)

3. It was a ground attack

Reply to wnylib (Original post)

Fri Mar 4, 2022, 03:49 PM

Mar 2022

Not aircraft damaging the plant.

Would the no fly zone extend to attacking ground forces?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ukraine no fly zone for nuclear plants? [View all] wnylib Mar 2022 OP

I agree completely. RockCreek Mar 2022 #1

Nope... 2naSalit Mar 2022 #2

Iron Dome supported by EU or UN, not US... AntiFascist Mar 2022 #4

It was a ground attack sarisataka Mar 2022 #3

Yes, it was a ground attack - this time. wnylib Mar 2022 #7

Long and short range AA will work better uponit7771 Mar 2022 #5

Against an air attack, yes. What about ground attacks? wnylib Mar 2022 #8

They have Javelin and NLaws, they got it covered unless RU goes to high altitude bombing. I've .. uponit7771 Mar 2022 #9

US is not going to militarily engage. David__77 Mar 2022 #6

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ukraine no fly zone for n...»Reply #3