Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

brewens

(15,359 posts)
Wed Apr 6, 2022, 07:54 AM Apr 2022

So, I looked to see just what they claim is on the copy of the hard drive they say was [View all]

from Hunter Biden's laptop. I was wondering what changed since we heard this story a couple years ago when the NY Post put it out.

Evidently the Washington Post authenticated emails on the copy of the HD they received. I don't remember doubting they had real copies of his emails, or that he had dealings in China that might be shady. It was the whole laptop story that stunk to high heaven. They aren't telling us the truth about how they got that.

One thing is Hunter and his uncle controlled entities that were paid a few million by a Chinese energy company. I suppose they'd like everyone to think Hunter and his uncle divvied all that up, but it doesn't even mean they made any money for sure. They probably did, but I don't see where they say what the entities did. It could be legit, and Hunter and his uncle might have made a reasonable profit.

That's just what I got from watching what FOX "News" and a couple other right-wing sources have told their viewers. So what? Hunter isn't in the administration and I doubt democrats will follow the republican playbook and run Hunter as our presidential nominee in a few years, like they did with George H.W. Bushes boy. He had a fake job with Harken Energy if you remember.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, I looked to see just ...