Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetroitLegalBeagle

(2,535 posts)
14. The weapons would be useless by now
Sat Apr 23, 2022, 06:41 PM
Apr 2022

Without regular maintenance, those warheads would be little more than material for dirty bombs. They wouldn't work. Tritium has a half life of a little over 12 years. Electronics, the conventional explosives, and other materials all degrade from the constant exposure to radiation and need to be replaced. The cores themselves, while stable enough to last decades or longer, have corrosion issues and periodically need to be remachined to clean it up. Ukraine did not have the skills or facilities to maintain them. Nor could they have developed those skills quickly after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Things were fairly chaotic, corruption was(arguably still) rampant, and they had bigger problems to deal with then trying to maintain security on a bunch of weapons they lacked the skill and operational control over. Which comes to another problem, they had no control of the weapons. They were physically located in Ukrainian territory but under Russian control.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's almost like "Christianity" is on hiatus. dchill Apr 2022 #1
And the pulpit leaders calling for Joe to be jailed... and the Chosen One to be resurrected. Evolve Dammit Apr 2022 #11
I find, anymore, many people don't give a damn unless something directly involves them. RKP5637 Apr 2022 #2
Sadly, I agree. U.S. just tuning out for the large part. Not all, but millions just don't give a Evolve Dammit Apr 2022 #10
Nope. It sure wouldn't be. onecaliberal Apr 2022 #3
Are we 100% that Ukraine didn't keep a spare? shelshaw Apr 2022 #4
A counterfactual with them keeping nukes in the 90s gets complicated muriel_volestrangler Apr 2022 #5
Sigh. Thanks for the response. Evolve Dammit Apr 2022 #9
I think our disinterest goes far beyond one conflict. Torchlight Apr 2022 #6
Not disagreeing at all. You are correct Evolve Dammit Apr 2022 #7
Agree w/Muriel above, but also Ukraine never had control of the nukes. The okaawhatever Apr 2022 #8
They weren't Ukraine's nuclear weapons. WhiskeyGrinder Apr 2022 #12
Well that sucks. They had no control and the nukes were in Ukraine? Evolve Dammit Apr 2022 #13
It was similar to (though not exactly like) federal properties in individual states. WhiskeyGrinder Apr 2022 #15
Yep DetroitLegalBeagle Apr 2022 #17
The weapons would be useless by now DetroitLegalBeagle Apr 2022 #14
thanks. Good analysis Evolve Dammit Apr 2022 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I wonder if Ukraine still...»Reply #14