Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

calimary

(81,110 posts)

12. Yep. This one's a keeper, for sure!

Reply to Nevilledog (Original post)

Fri May 20, 2022, 10:54 PM

May 2022

Thanks, Nevilledog!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Lancet: Why Roe v. Wade must be defended [View all] Nevilledog May 2022 OP

KNR and bookmarking. niyad May 2022 #1

K&R. intheflow May 2022 #2

Kick Nevilledog May 2022 #3

K&R Thanks for posting. n/t TeamProg May 2022 #4

Good article, but a couple of points could have been better presented. Lonestarblue May 2022 #5

++ Both correct and very important. appalachiablue May 2022 #11

Kick. MontanaMama May 2022 #6

Link to the full editorial that doesn't have parentheses that DU trips over muriel_volestrangler May 2022 #7

Can't believe no one (including me) caught that!. Thank you, I'll fix it. Nevilledog May 2022 #8

Kick BlueWavePsych May 2022 #9

What makes the writer(s) of The Lancet think the five justices give a shit? Texin May 2022 #10

Yep. This one's a keeper, for sure! calimary May 2022 #12

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Lancet: Why Roe v. Wa...»Reply #12