Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

no_hypocrisy

(45,993 posts)

6. I have a different take:

Reply to Atticus (Original post)

Sun May 22, 2022, 07:47 PM

May 2022

Last edited Mon May 23, 2022, 06:14 AM - Edit history (1)

Let Clarence squirm while other Justices go after Ginni. And don't forget new Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson will be gearing up for some really inquisitive inquiries.

And what could Thomas possibly write in an opinion that justifies his wife's antics/insurrection?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I believe it to be true that Clarence Thomas could not even be prevented from taking part [View all] Atticus May 2022 OP

No bipartisan exboyfil May 2022 #1

Clarence Thomas will never recuse himself. dchill May 2022 #2

Correct, there is no forcing a justice to do anything. elleng May 2022 #3

you COULD force them off the bench RussBLib May 2022 #16

charge her to the fullest extent of the law...and let public opinion take the wheel. Grasswire2 May 2022 #4

I'm with 'ya, but............ MyOwnPeace May 2022 #12

It ABSOLUTELY must end. calimary May 2022 #13

"look forward, not back" is about to lose us our republic. Grasswire2 May 2022 #14

She was on the Bush inauguration committee! LisaM May 2022 #5

I have a different take: no_hypocrisy May 2022 #6

by being a republican judge. barbtries May 2022 #7

He never thought they would be caught in the act Mr. Ected May 2022 #8

He has no say unless a case makes it to scotus..... getagrip_already May 2022 #9

I think he could work the rocket docket. plimsoll May 2022 #10

Clarence Thomas recusal donte May 2022 #11

We need a new Amendment to the Constitution...and as soon as possible...on impeaching SC Justices. Samrob May 2022 #15

well its already there. drray23 May 2022 #17

Essentially jury nullification no_hypocrisy May 2022 #18

Never happening budkin May 2022 #19

My prediction -- the Court will never take a challenge to a Ginni conviction onenote May 2022 #20

I totally agree. I was using her fictional and highly unlikely criminal conviction as Atticus May 2022 #21