Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

moniss

(9,162 posts)

4. You don't need a tape recording per se

Reply to Septua (Original post)

Fri Jun 17, 2022, 07:25 PM

Jun 2022

because the criminal standard will be "beyond a reasonable doubt". If you had a tape then fine but mounds of testimony and evidence give enough to indict and try. Remember of course that even if you had a tape of the Orange Ruski clearly speaking his intent a rogue juror may nullify the whole thing no matter what.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Intent", still not quite there. [View all] Septua Jun 2022 OP

You are driving your car, you get pulled over by the cops, and you get a ticket for speeding. Midnight Writer Jun 2022 #1

You need to forward this to several lawyers !!!!!!! Karadeniz Jun 2022 #3

Could happen to anyone! gratuitous Jun 2022 #2

You don't need a tape recording per se moniss Jun 2022 #4