The use of originalism to judge the 2nd amendment is a fools errand.

[Model35mech]

6. Unfortunately for originalists, the Founders thought the Constitution required revision

and they set up the process for doing that.

Recognizing the need for revision is in its fundamental essence anti-originialist.

The Founders, in majority decisions set this up. It's damned surprising to me that this is still something that is argued about

As the US has a standing military of Army, Air-Force/Space Force, Navy/Marine contingents, there is really no need for the militia spoken of in the second amendment. The National Guard really IS NOT a militia of citizens, enrolled, drilled, and available for local/regional combat against England, France, Spain or those nations colonies, or the Indigenous Peoples remaining. It -IS- a wing of the military activated and controlled by federal command and released, on occassion to do safety and emergency response in its home states.

OUR SIDE has done a really SHODDY JOB of arguing this point, and moreover, protecting the Courts from crazy ideas and conservative extremism.