Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

llmart

(15,536 posts)
34. I don't blame you one iota.
Thu Jun 23, 2022, 07:04 PM
Jun 2022

A couple friends and I were planning a vacation together somewhere in the US (we live here), but we decided to vacation in Canada this year. One of them said, "I don't feel safe in the US any longer." This was before today's godawful ruling.

Good 👍 one! sheshe2 Jun 2022 #1
Watching NY Governor Hochul speaking about the SC decision overturning her state's gun law. sop Jun 2022 #2
I live 30 minutes from the Ontario/NYS border, and can see upper NYS luvtheGWN Jun 2022 #16
I don't blame you one iota. llmart Jun 2022 #34
I always considered NYS to be fairly safe, too. wnylib Jun 2022 #41
She was once disndat Jun 2022 #47
And take ownership of your increased need for security and stop sponging off us BeyondGeography Jun 2022 #3
All Democrats need to claw back the increased SC protection, and they need to Scrivener7 Jun 2022 #4
Don't really want Justretired Jun 2022 #5
I hear you... TheRealNorth Jun 2022 #8
Sounds good but I doubt you'd ever get a shot off. jaxexpat Jun 2022 #13
I suppose being a "Good German" is safer.... TheRealNorth Jun 2022 #31
They don't feel threatened by guns. They feel threatened by chalk. nt Jade Fox Jun 2022 #6
One rule for the lifetime ruling class bronxiteforever Jun 2022 #7
People of color need to start open carrying elias7 Jun 2022 #9
When the Black Panthers were photographed carrying guns leftieNanner Jun 2022 #10
+1 RamblingRose Jun 2022 #15
It would make them open season for scared white men. onecaliberal Jun 2022 #20
Absolutely. RocRizzo55 Jun 2022 #26
The only gun control that Republicans accept is wnylib Jun 2022 #42
This is what they really said.... Don't be the last on your Block to get a Glock! ashredux Jun 2022 #11
+1 chowder66 Jun 2022 #17
To add insult to injury, we're paying for their fucking protection. Vinca Jun 2022 #12
Absolutely! Rebl2 Jun 2022 #14
I wonder if the SC justices Mr. Evil Jun 2022 #18
Come on now we aren't allowed on the rich peoples streets. The Jungle 1 Jun 2022 #29
WTF Mr. Evil Jun 2022 #33
Repeat after me: "We are not worthy. We are not worthy. We are not worthy to walk, bike, or drive ShazzieB Jun 2022 #40
Just because it's called the Supreme Court, wnylib Jun 2022 #43
But...but they are privileged and they have set it up that way with their rulings. They protect.... usaf-vet Jun 2022 #19
They think kids coming home from school decapitated is an acceptable sacrifice for their "right" onecaliberal Jun 2022 #25
We've come to this Nevilledog Jun 2022 #32
No protection for the Unsupreme court. BlueJac Jun 2022 #21
Their hypocrisy should be in millions of 2022 campaign ads. n/t MarcA Jun 2022 #22
Absofuckingloutely! SheltieLover Jun 2022 #23
They all have paper courage RANDYWILDMAN Jun 2022 #24
No protection for them! What bought and paid for assholes! burrowowl Jun 2022 #27
Well, only muskets and the pistols of the burrowowl Jun 2022 #28
No special protection for wnylib Jun 2022 #44
Uvalde school police chief placed on leave The Jungle 1 Jun 2022 #30
Brilliant!!! Cha Jun 2022 #35
Exactly! start packing your own? Wild west returns Evolve Dammit Jun 2022 #36
Why are they asking for extra protection? dickthegrouch Jun 2022 #37
You want gun culture run amok...then live with the results of your stupidity...toxic, Demsrule86 Jun 2022 #38
what the SC just azureblue Jun 2022 #39
Besides beating into a plow share, name one thing... czarjak Jun 2022 #45
Read the ruling. Straw Man Jun 2022 #46
Always Ironic to see disndat Jun 2022 #48
Follow the money, these guys are bought and paid for bucolic_frolic Jun 2022 #49
Also it's time to stop saying that you are "pro life". Initech Jun 2022 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dear "supreme court", if ...»Reply #34