Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(60,083 posts)

10. That isn't a "stance." It's an interpretation of current law. It's probably correct as of

Tue Jun 28, 2022, 06:44 AM

Jun 2022

today, but that means nothing about whether it will be law tomorrow given this Supreme Court.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

We're Not Going Back to the Time Before Roe. We're Going Somewhere Worse [View all] Nevilledog Jun 2022 OP

It'll go to SCROTUS and they'll say it can be restricted. Nevilledog Jun 2022 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author PortTack Jun 2022 #3

They may try..federal prevails in this arguement PortTack Jun 2022 #4

Have you met the Supreme Court? Nevilledog Jun 2022 #5

In the meantime it would take months maybe or at least a year PortTack Jun 2022 #6

I wonder if the underground market is ramping up Cheezoholic Jun 2022 #8

I'm sure it's already started Freddie Jun 2022 #9

K&R Solly Mack Jun 2022 #12