Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bev54

(10,044 posts)

4. It amuses me that Trump lawyers are inferring that injury to Trump would

Reply to GreenWave (Reply #3)

Sat Sep 3, 2022, 04:39 PM

Sep 2022

be that these documents could be used as evidence in a criminal investigation or trial???? Duh yeah, if they read the warrant there are 3 criminal statutes on it. Geez.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Transcripts from the Sept 1 hearing before Judge Cannon [View all] Bev54 Sep 2022 OP

Thanks for the link, it was very interesting reading. I thought govt case was better than plaintiff emulatorloo Sep 2022 #1

Yes the government argues the law, the other side argues on disparaging the FBI Bev54 Sep 2022 #2

FYI, the FBI "Filter Team" really IS on the hot seat. WarGamer Sep 2022 #8

This is once again an attorney's office which has client attorney privilege Bev54 Sep 2022 #9

Like I said... "FBI Filter Teams" are on the hot seat. WarGamer Sep 2022 #10

Amazing that Trump' s theft of National Archives documents GreenWave Sep 2022 #3

It amuses me that Trump lawyers are inferring that injury to Trump would Bev54 Sep 2022 #4

It amuses me his lawyers never get paid. Emile Sep 2022 #6

Was she scheduled to make another decision today? kentuck Sep 2022 #5

Nothing was said about it in the transcripts Bev54 Sep 2022 #7

Thank you for posting the link. EndlessWire Sep 2022 #11