Trumps lawyers are telling us they have no defense in the secret document investigation.

[uponit7771]

64. We agree that NARA doesn't have authority to designated records but that's not ...

... material here seeing the docs TFG has already ***BEEN*** marked with government markings indicating that they belong to the gov.

That's a fact we both agree with; majority of docs TFG has already have been indicated in someway to be US government property.

You're claiming the Clinton tapes weren't marked at all with anything ... I don't read that but lets say they weren't.

That's even worse case for TFG's case because the documents he had ***WHERE*** marked as belonging to the USG.

NARA does not have the authority to designate materials as “Presidential records,” NARA does not have the tapes in question, and NARA lacks any right, duty, or means to seize control of them.

We agree with the bolded text but its not material to the point that the the docs TFG has already been indicated to be government property.

This case if ruled in TFGs favor would open up a shit can of worms of claims of who's who's information when someone leaves a place of employment for instance.

I right a sticky note to buy ribs on the way home in my work place doesn't mean its work place product ... that's already been decided.

In TFGs case I just can't claim something with my employers name at the top of it as mine either when there's explicit indicators they're not.

Jackson's ruling is clear; those Clinton tapes MAGA wanted weren't government product and that was clear of that on the face of the case.

The docs TFG is trying to keep isn't **HIS** personal belongings and that is clear on the face of this case too.