General Discussion

LudwigPastorius

(9,092 posts)

24. "must we wait until those who admit their intent to destroy us to "actually" open fire before our...

Mon Dec 12, 2022, 12:54 PM

Dec 2022

use of violence against them qualifies as "self defense"?"

In determining whether an individual would pose an actual and imminent threat, the factors to be considered include: The duration of the risk, the nature and severity of the potential harm, the likelihood that the potential harm will occur, and the length of time before the potential harm would occur.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I do not know how long this post will last. It is intended not to advocate violence, but to [View all] Atticus Dec 2022 OP

For the use of force I believe in the "clear and present danger" requirement Walleye Dec 2022 #1

i agree... samnsara Dec 2022 #2

Every precaution should be taken to defend yourself... kentuck Dec 2022 #3

Starting with a "clear understanding" of the "self" that one is defending sanatanadharma Dec 2022 #8

I read Alan Watts in the late 60's including "The Book on the Taboo Against panader0 Dec 2022 #13

Check out the other thread regarding the paradox of intolerance. WhiskeyGrinder Dec 2022 #4

Thank you. nt Atticus Dec 2022 #11

Thanks for the meme & article link KS Toronado Dec 2022 #34

Tolerance extends to all actions that do not hurt others or the community Mysterian Dec 2022 #5

If we had a fully functioning judicial/law enforcement system, you wouldn't have to pose that... Probatim Dec 2022 #6

+1 CrispyQ Dec 2022 #7

+1, could you imagine if Muslims were acting like MAGA acts right now? There would be mass ... uponit7771 Dec 2022 #14

The same would have been true if Muslims/POC raided the Capitol on 1/6. Probatim Dec 2022 #17

I think your post is the answer. We have the laws that should keep intolerance in check, but Scrivener7 Dec 2022 #21

+1 n/t area51 Dec 2022 #25

I had a good neighborhood in the countryside. Tetrachloride Dec 2022 #9

Atticus, I'm hoping the thread stays up, too, because it's something I've wondered a lot about BComplex Dec 2022 #10

K&R, isn't it against the law to threaten someone with violence? Thx in advance uponit7771 Dec 2022 #12

The Germans apparently know how to deal with it. Firestorm49 Dec 2022 #15

A great man once said nightwing1240 Dec 2022 #16

Arjuna was faced with the problem of his family and loved ones dying sanatanadharma Dec 2022 #19

it certainly is not nightwing1240 Dec 2022 #35

If I would have to kill to live, I would rather die than living with the knowledge I took someones Atticus Dec 2022 #22

Forget ones self for a moment. Prairie_Seagull Dec 2022 #28

Often also natural to save one's child even at cost of one's own life lostnfound Dec 2022 #29

I am better than no one nightwing1240 Dec 2022 #36

Thank you, thank you, thank you arlyellowdog Dec 2022 #26

"Violence could not triumph" nightwing1240 Dec 2022 #37

too generalized GenXer47 Dec 2022 #18

When they go low, we go high IronLionZion Dec 2022 #20

I believe the answer to intolerance is not violence unless it is truly a last resort. Lonestarblue Dec 2022 #23

"must we wait until those who admit their intent to destroy us to "actually" open fire before our... LudwigPastorius Dec 2022 #24

exactly, I agree llashram Dec 2022 #27

To be in the right, we must wait until a threat is imminent before resorting to violence. hadEnuf Dec 2022 #30

I'm a woman and I've spent most of my life living alone Warpy Dec 2022 #31

Think Kyle Rittenhouse coming down the street... rubbersole Dec 2022 #32

not many will remember 2016 Slammer Dec 2022 #33

Krishna's answer to Arjuna's dilemma sanatanadharma Dec 2022 #38

If I understand you correctly Martin Eden Dec 2022 #39

Order 66? Fla_Democrat Dec 2022 #40

All I have is my integrity I_UndergroundPanther Dec 2022 #41

How do you define "to destroy us" Kaleva Dec 2022 #42