General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I do not know how long this post will last. It is intended not to advocate violence, but to [View all]Martin Eden
(13,316 posts)You are suggesting preemptive violence may be necessary and therefore justified to prevent others from "destroying us."
In practical terms it is necessary to define exactly what "destroying us" means and what specific violent actions need to be taken against which individuals to stop that from happening.
We should also be aware there are thousands if not millions of heavily armed righting yahoos who fantasize about using their 2A joysticks against people they've been conditioned to hate.
And they won't be very judicious in selecting their targets. Escalation of violence in the civil war they have been itching for would claim many innocent lives.
Ultimately, "justify" means that which truly achieves justice.
The scenario I envision ensuing from preemptive violence on our part would inflict horrible injustice far outside the realm of our original intent.