General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Statute of limitations on Trump over Stormy Daniels [View all]hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)I'm sorry if you aren't following my threads, but I have included a detailed discussion on the individual issues and links when appropriate to support my points. I honestly and sincerely do not know what more you want.
The SOL for NY State is a separate discussion than that for the FEDERAL level, but when you throw Trump's lawyers' arguments in the mix, it seems clear they are talking about the FEDERAL SOL. SO I discussed that to clear up any confusion in my FIRST post. Likewise, it probably is impacting Bragg's change of heart to pursue it now after initially apparently deciding to defer, so it is related.
The issue with the DOJ LOC opinion on whether or not you can indict a sitting president is another separate issue that I addressed when a poster (Poiuyt) brought it up. Separate issues. As is any potential SCOTUS opinion if and when that memo is changed, ignored, and some AG sometime POTENTIALLY decides to indict a sitting President.
The Mueller issue is likewise related but separate on the decision not to proceed regardless of the LOC decision, given Mueller was out of time and had not been able to prove CONSPIRACY (collusion is not a legal concept).
I enjoy discussing things with you gab13by13, but sometimes it appears you create unrelated arguments without reading prior posts or that reframe my comments totally. Maybe you just feel like arguing for the heck of it. We probably all do so sometimes. Likewise, perhaps that is not intentional...
Regardless, have a good day as I am back to work.