Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)

2. So, the senate committee panel will vote on whether Schultz's

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Fri Mar 3, 2023, 09:50 PM

Mar 2023

testimony is needed and the validity of Schultz's request to be excused as not really involved. Schultz is much high-profile nationally than other executives and involved with anti-union decisions if not the events that triggered this investigation.

Btw, the committee, with 11 Dems and 10 Repubs, is controlled by Democrats with Sanders as the chair. It's expected to be approved. As we know, congress has little to no power to actually compel compliance with their subpoenas, but just Schultz's name will help draw attention to the investigation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Starbucks tries to thwart Bernie Sanders' bid to subpoena Howard Schultz [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2023 OP

Schultz can't be bothered dlk Mar 2023 #1

So, the senate committee panel will vote on whether Schultz's Hortensis Mar 2023 #2