General Discussion

Yavin4

(37,182 posts)

12. He's still working on the 1/6 indictments as well.

Reply to KS Toronado (Original post)

Sat Jun 17, 2023, 12:47 PM

Jun 2023

The man is going to bring a whole Marvel Cinematic Universe of charges against Trump.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What Jack Smith isn't telling us [View all] KS Toronado Jun 2023 OP

Recommended. H2O Man Jun 2023 #1

Link? jaxexpat Jun 2023 #3

The link H2O Man Jun 2023 #4

I hope, then, that he is not hesitant to pull out his big ...... jaxexpat Jun 2023 #23

Right. H2O Man Jun 2023 #28

And Smith gets new, additional evidence every time... Septua Jun 2023 #22

Great points, H2O Man Jun 2023 #29

won't matter much if the judge dismisses the case. But, soooo many other cases. mucifer Jun 2023 #2

There is a grand jury on the documents case still sitting in D.C. speak easy Jun 2023 #37

That's very interesting, because SCOTUS soldierant Jun 2023 #51

Smith (only) needs a case that is properly held in D.C. speak easy Jun 2023 #53

I'm sure he has at least one such case. soldierant Jun 2023 #64

Hear that, Donny? Blue Owl Jun 2023 #5

K and R...Thanks for posting.. Stuart G Jun 2023 #6

it would be great if he does have evidence of selling our secrets. We all know mucifer Jun 2023 #7

If Jack Smith goes to the FISA court with national security probable cause, and he likely will, ancianita Jun 2023 #11

This hits the nail on the head for me hydrolastic Jun 2023 #8

THIS! THIS! THIS! OMGWTF Jun 2023 #16

Wouldn't get my hopes up 617Blue Jun 2023 #9

When was the last time? H2O Man Jun 2023 #17

Mueller, Fitzgerald 617Blue Jun 2023 #44

Patrick Fitzgerald H2O Man Jun 2023 #46

Point Taken 617Blue Jun 2023 #49

You have such a way with words! calimary Jun 2023 #57

Yup, I agree! dmr Jun 2023 #61

Neither of those two charged the top people. Smith has and will again. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2023 #58

+1 sheshe2 Jun 2023 #45

Thank you! H2O Man Jun 2023 #47

Yes praxEs Jun 2023 #10

He's still working on the 1/6 indictments as well. Yavin4 Jun 2023 #12

The DC Universe is the Merde-de-Lardo docs. Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #15

Fabulous malaise Jun 2023 #41

Trump may lose his freedom someday, but I doubt he will ever be behind "bars". elocs Jun 2023 #13

Let him have his ketchup.... cannabis_flower Jun 2023 #19

I'm thinking house arrest in the golf palace of his choosing Warpy Jun 2023 #20

I agree. ShazzieB Jun 2023 #50

Yes, I couldn't see his SS detail in prison, either. Warpy Jun 2023 #52

He would lose the detail... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #62

I agree with you that it's hard to imagine a federal judge sentencing him to prison FakeNoose Jun 2023 #36

I damn sure can't see aileen cannon sentencing him to prison prodigitalson Jun 2023 #54

yep, and a lot we will never know, because it can't be proven. republianmushroom Jun 2023 #14

What? ProfessorGAC Jun 2023 #33

You seem to think your secret is important Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2023 #59

This case will probably be dismissed by fascist traitor Cannon. lark Jun 2023 #18

With all the publicity it will be difficult for her to take that action. LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #25

I think A is her most likely action. lark Jun 2023 #30

Then she has to think whether Smith has other options to still go after Trump LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #34

She doesn't seem to care one little bit. lark Jun 2023 #60

But she won't think it's a stupid mistake since moonscape Jun 2023 #32

Her life or the lives of those mucifer Jun 2023 #39

Why wouldn't that be the case for any other judge that replaced her? onenote Jun 2023 #56

What has seeped out: GreenWave Jun 2023 #21

Nicely played malaise Jun 2023 #42

Never play all of your cards at once. LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #24

Love it malaise Jun 2023 #26

It would be a travesty if a Judge prevented a jury from hearing this case. kentuck Jun 2023 #27

I wonder if the way Trump was handled after the indictment wasn't to get more evidence for trial. lees1975 Jun 2023 #31

Hhmmm...I keep wondering why no gag orders but your post has me thinking.. Deuxcents Jun 2023 #48

Smith is seeking a gag order regarding "uncharged individuals" in other investigations Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2023 #66

K&R LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2023 #35

I was thinking same thing as I was working in garage. gibraltar72 Jun 2023 #38

well that's encouragingly Refreshing! Cha Jun 2023 #40

If, by some chance or misfortune, the Judge is prepared to put the trial on a long delay... kentuck Jun 2023 #43

Sounds just like what we all said about Mueller Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #55

Yes, BUT, Mueller's scope of investigation was tightly defined by Republicans Hortensis Jun 2023 #63

I honestly cannot see Trump going to jail. KentuckyWoman Jun 2023 #65