General Discussion

speak easy

(12,598 posts)

53. Smith (only) needs a case that is properly held in D.C.

Sat Jun 17, 2023, 09:33 PM

Jun 2023

He may be holding charges that meet that meet that test. Obviously Floria is the proper venue for the obstruction of justice counts.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What Jack Smith isn't telling us [View all] KS Toronado Jun 2023 OP

Recommended. H2O Man Jun 2023 #1

Link? jaxexpat Jun 2023 #3

The link H2O Man Jun 2023 #4

I hope, then, that he is not hesitant to pull out his big ...... jaxexpat Jun 2023 #23

Right. H2O Man Jun 2023 #28

And Smith gets new, additional evidence every time... Septua Jun 2023 #22

Great points, H2O Man Jun 2023 #29

won't matter much if the judge dismisses the case. But, soooo many other cases. mucifer Jun 2023 #2

There is a grand jury on the documents case still sitting in D.C. speak easy Jun 2023 #37

That's very interesting, because SCOTUS soldierant Jun 2023 #51

Smith (only) needs a case that is properly held in D.C. speak easy Jun 2023 #53

I'm sure he has at least one such case. soldierant Jun 2023 #64

Hear that, Donny? Blue Owl Jun 2023 #5

K and R...Thanks for posting.. Stuart G Jun 2023 #6

it would be great if he does have evidence of selling our secrets. We all know mucifer Jun 2023 #7

If Jack Smith goes to the FISA court with national security probable cause, and he likely will, ancianita Jun 2023 #11

This hits the nail on the head for me hydrolastic Jun 2023 #8

THIS! THIS! THIS! OMGWTF Jun 2023 #16

Wouldn't get my hopes up 617Blue Jun 2023 #9

When was the last time? H2O Man Jun 2023 #17

Mueller, Fitzgerald 617Blue Jun 2023 #44

Patrick Fitzgerald H2O Man Jun 2023 #46

Point Taken 617Blue Jun 2023 #49

You have such a way with words! calimary Jun 2023 #57

Yup, I agree! dmr Jun 2023 #61

Neither of those two charged the top people. Smith has and will again. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2023 #58

+1 sheshe2 Jun 2023 #45

Thank you! H2O Man Jun 2023 #47

Yes praxEs Jun 2023 #10

He's still working on the 1/6 indictments as well. Yavin4 Jun 2023 #12

The DC Universe is the Merde-de-Lardo docs. Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #15

Fabulous malaise Jun 2023 #41

Trump may lose his freedom someday, but I doubt he will ever be behind "bars". elocs Jun 2023 #13

Let him have his ketchup.... cannabis_flower Jun 2023 #19

I'm thinking house arrest in the golf palace of his choosing Warpy Jun 2023 #20

I agree. ShazzieB Jun 2023 #50

Yes, I couldn't see his SS detail in prison, either. Warpy Jun 2023 #52

He would lose the detail... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #62

I agree with you that it's hard to imagine a federal judge sentencing him to prison FakeNoose Jun 2023 #36

I damn sure can't see aileen cannon sentencing him to prison prodigitalson Jun 2023 #54

yep, and a lot we will never know, because it can't be proven. republianmushroom Jun 2023 #14

What? ProfessorGAC Jun 2023 #33

You seem to think your secret is important Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2023 #59

This case will probably be dismissed by fascist traitor Cannon. lark Jun 2023 #18

With all the publicity it will be difficult for her to take that action. LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #25

I think A is her most likely action. lark Jun 2023 #30

Then she has to think whether Smith has other options to still go after Trump LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #34

She doesn't seem to care one little bit. lark Jun 2023 #60

But she won't think it's a stupid mistake since moonscape Jun 2023 #32

Her life or the lives of those mucifer Jun 2023 #39

Why wouldn't that be the case for any other judge that replaced her? onenote Jun 2023 #56

What has seeped out: GreenWave Jun 2023 #21

Nicely played malaise Jun 2023 #42

Never play all of your cards at once. LiberalFighter Jun 2023 #24

Love it malaise Jun 2023 #26

It would be a travesty if a Judge prevented a jury from hearing this case. kentuck Jun 2023 #27

I wonder if the way Trump was handled after the indictment wasn't to get more evidence for trial. lees1975 Jun 2023 #31

Hhmmm...I keep wondering why no gag orders but your post has me thinking.. Deuxcents Jun 2023 #48

Smith is seeking a gag order regarding "uncharged individuals" in other investigations Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2023 #66

K&R LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2023 #35

I was thinking same thing as I was working in garage. gibraltar72 Jun 2023 #38

well that's encouragingly Refreshing! Cha Jun 2023 #40

If, by some chance or misfortune, the Judge is prepared to put the trial on a long delay... kentuck Jun 2023 #43

Sounds just like what we all said about Mueller Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2023 #55

Yes, BUT, Mueller's scope of investigation was tightly defined by Republicans Hortensis Jun 2023 #63

I honestly cannot see Trump going to jail. KentuckyWoman Jun 2023 #65