Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 'Shady and corrupt': Barrett real estate deal added to list of Supreme Court ethics scandals [View all]calimary
(86,245 posts)24. Well, maybe we should start making noise about this.
SCOTUS is the only branch of our government NOT to have some sort of code of ethics. Thats gonna be one of our asks this weekend.
Im mentioning Clarence (the Crook) Thomas, Samuel Alito, and just now found another one involving Amy Coney Barrett. AND I was noticing this outfit called the Religious Liberty Initiative that appears to figure into some sweetheart deals with both Alito AND Barrett - in separate involvements.
Am I crazy because I think Im noticing a fishy smell?
I'll post the ask I just wrote up, for distribution early next week:
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

'Shady and corrupt': Barrett real estate deal added to list of Supreme Court ethics scandals [View all]
Nevilledog
Jun 2023
OP
I know, when I worked for a newspaper we weren't allowed to take anything except homemade cookies
Walleye
Jun 2023
#15
so that when there is one protestant church allowed it will be some form of Baptist.
Captain Zero
Jun 2023
#25
Ethics (?) What are ethics ? Naw we don't need those encumbering rules.
republianmushroom
Jun 2023
#7
We used to have trust and faith that our Supreme Court justices were above this kind of thing
Walleye
Jun 2023
#17
She could have sold her house to ANY OTHER professor and it would have meant nothing
FakeNoose
Jun 2023
#21