Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Something's curious about the web designer's SCOTUS case... [View all]onenote
(46,230 posts)37. Yes. Forty-five years of practice, including a few cases before the Supreme Court.
Since you asked.
And as I've said repeatedly, I disagree vehemently with the majority's decision in favor of the plaintiff on the merits for the reasons forcefully given by Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson Brown (and by the Tenth Circuit).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Something's curious about the web designer's SCOTUS case... [View all]
allegorical oracle
Jun 2023
OP
Can you sue the Supreme Court for basing a decision on fake information? Just kidding!
Lonestarblue
Jun 2023
#3
Agree. I think the Sorry Six decide what laws they want to overturn then shop for or make up
LoisB
Jun 2023
#6
Can recall a call from Thomas after the Dobbs case soliciting others to come forward with cases
allegorical oracle
Jul 2023
#22
Am wondering who the defender Elenis is. Didn't think the Supremes would take a case if
allegorical oracle
Jun 2023
#12
Interesting. Chris Hayes last night (Fri.) showed a quote that I can only mention about how
allegorical oracle
Jul 2023
#23
Lorie Smith (303 Creative LLC) sued Colorado (naming a bunch of Colorado officials
Hortensis
Jun 2023
#7
Thank you for that. I missed your post (and wish I'd checked before searching. Never saw a
allegorical oracle
Jul 2023
#24
Yes. Forty-five years of practice, including a few cases before the Supreme Court.
onenote
Jul 2023
#37
The issues about the lack of a case or controversy was evidently not before the SCOTUS
LetMyPeopleVote
Jul 2023
#38
Procedure exists to force the Supreme Court to rehear 'made up' wedding website case: Neal Katyal
LetMyPeopleVote
Jul 2023
#34
So if I get it in my crazy brain one night that some individual intends to murder me, can I sue
allegorical oracle
Jul 2023
#25
Yeah there's something about this that stinks and I can't quite put my finger on it.
Initech
Jul 2023
#30
Man cited in Supreme Court LGBTQ rights case says he was never involved
LetMyPeopleVote
Jul 2023
#33