Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,230 posts)
37. Yes. Forty-five years of practice, including a few cases before the Supreme Court.
Sun Jul 2, 2023, 04:28 PM
Jul 2023

Since you asked.

And as I've said repeatedly, I disagree vehemently with the majority's decision in favor of the plaintiff on the merits for the reasons forcefully given by Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson Brown (and by the Tenth Circuit).

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Jeepers. Stewart needs to find a cutthroat attorney to sue Smith and the ADF. tanyev Jun 2023 #1
Check out this thread: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218053777 mainer Jun 2023 #2
Can you sue the Supreme Court for basing a decision on fake information? Just kidding! Lonestarblue Jun 2023 #3
They are illegitimate, ignore the court until they resign! Bluethroughu Jun 2023 #4
Unfortunately, the decision wasn't based on that information. onenote Jul 2023 #16
SCOTUS has done this before. slightlv Jun 2023 #5
Agree. I think the Sorry Six decide what laws they want to overturn then shop for or make up LoisB Jun 2023 #6
Exactly what I was saying... slightlv Jun 2023 #8
Nah. I just copied your thoughts. LoisB Jun 2023 #9
Well, groups like the ADF and the Federalist Society do all the legwork, tanyev Jun 2023 #10
Yep. Pretty much to justice what ALEC is to legislation. LoisB Jun 2023 #11
Can recall a call from Thomas after the Dobbs case soliciting others to come forward with cases allegorical oracle Jul 2023 #22
Am wondering who the defender Elenis is. Didn't think the Supremes would take a case if allegorical oracle Jun 2023 #12
Pre-enforcement standing is a well-recognized legal principle onenote Jul 2023 #17
Interesting. Chris Hayes last night (Fri.) showed a quote that I can only mention about how allegorical oracle Jul 2023 #23
Lorie Smith (303 Creative LLC) sued Colorado (naming a bunch of Colorado officials Hortensis Jun 2023 #7
Thank you for that. I missed your post (and wish I'd checked before searching. Never saw a allegorical oracle Jul 2023 #24
Identity Theft NowISeetheLight Jun 2023 #13
Good point - maybe her identity has been hijacked FakeNoose Jul 2023 #26
There was no true case or controversy LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #14
Chasten Buttigieg is a wonderful person but he's not a lawyer onenote Jul 2023 #18
I am a lawyer and there was no real case or controversy here LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #20
So why didn't Sotomayor, Kagan, and Ketanji Jackson mention standing? onenote Jul 2023 #21
This was a manufactured case LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #29
And you think Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson Brown were accomplices? onenote Jul 2023 #31
Do you tire of being wrong? LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #32
I'm happy to admit when i'm wrong. In this instance, i'm not wrong. onenote Jul 2023 #35
Are you a member of the bar? LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #36
Yes. Forty-five years of practice, including a few cases before the Supreme Court. onenote Jul 2023 #37
The issues about the lack of a case or controversy was evidently not before the SCOTUS LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #38
Procedure exists to force the Supreme Court to rehear 'made up' wedding website case: Neal Katyal LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #34
Iokiyar. And how does this constitute true standing and actual harm? lostnfound Jul 2023 #15
Pre-enforcement standing is a well-recognized legal principle among lawyers. onenote Jul 2023 #19
So if I get it in my crazy brain one night that some individual intends to murder me, can I sue allegorical oracle Jul 2023 #25
No. onenote Jul 2023 #27
Actually the phrase alone is self--explanatory lostnfound Jul 2023 #28
Yeah there's something about this that stinks and I can't quite put my finger on it. Initech Jul 2023 #30
Man cited in Supreme Court LGBTQ rights case says he was never involved LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2023 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Something's curious about...»Reply #37