General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Anonymous has definitive proof that Rove tried to hack the vote, present it. [View all]alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)If we are to believe this statement (supposedly from Anonymous), we would have to believe
1) There was code associated with the attempted "theft"
2) Anonymous wrote additional code that disabled that code
That's at a minimum.
So where's the code? This isn't a matter of interpreting Karl Rove's behavior. This is empirically verifiable: X code performs Y functions on Z machine. We stopped X code from working by deploying X' fix.
That's verifiable by any third party. That's what we call...."science." And any programmer with the slightest bit of self-respect would release just that with the claim to have developed a coding fix. You can't be about transparency and science one minute and about tea leaves reading the next. There's an easy way to verify the claim: release the code.