Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
They don't want to further hurt Republicans this year. RandySF Jun 13 #1
Fuck them. We're coming. onecaliberal Jun 13 #34
Big win for human rights Johnny2X2X Jun 13 #2
SCOTUS had to take this case. House of Roberts Jun 13 #11
Oh right, I forgot Johnny2X2X Jun 13 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author hlthe2b Jun 13 #3
So you wanted the 5th Circuit ruling to stand? Zeitghost Jun 13 #21
Post removed Post removed Jun 13 #25
Next - no Immunity malaise Jun 13 #4
SCOTUSblog says we have to wait until next week for that opinion? blogslug Jun 13 #16
Would be the perfect birthday present malaise Jun 13 #18
I don't understand. She says next week. Then she says maybe tomorrow? Takket Jun 13 #19
It's hard to tell from the excerpt, but those comments are from 2 different posters. sl8 Jun 13 #23
I don't understand either blogslug Jun 13 #28
Well I'll be damned. lamp_shade Jun 13 #5
For now.............................. Lovie777 Jun 13 #6
Fucking weasels Stinky The Clown Jun 13 #7
There are anti abortion people who will see this ruling as an invitation wnylib Jun 13 #33
They had to take the case... appmanga Jun 13 #8
The 5th Circuit said they had standing... so yes they had to take the case. In It to Win It Jun 13 #12
This should have been a minute order (nt) appmanga Jun 13 #17
EXACTLY! bluestarone Jun 13 #30
BREAKING: Supreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pill. LetMyPeopleVote Jun 13 #9
The plaintiffs in the Mifepristone case lack standing, the Supreme Court rules. LetMyPeopleVote Jun 13 #10
Will Trump figure out a way to take credit for it? "I appointed the judges who......" Ping Tung Jun 13 #14
So sorry, Matthew...now go sod off. pecosbob Jun 13 #15
The problem here is what will SCOTUS do if someone who DOES have standing makes a case Takket Jun 13 #20
AGREE! This long and NO ACTUAL ruling on the issue! bluestarone Jun 13 #31
Who would have standing? And how does a no-standing case go all the way to SCOTUS? bucolic_frolic Jun 13 #22
The trial court and appeals court said they had standing In It to Win It Jun 13 #26
147 republicans in Congress begged the court to ban the drug and told women to go to hell. LetMyPeopleVote Jun 13 #24
This ultimately won't matter because they plan on outlawing in under Comstock. Nevilledog Jun 13 #27
And cock blocks Convicted Felon returning to scene of the crime. Virtually no MSNBC coverage! GreenWave Jun 13 #29
Plaintiffs did not have standing to sue, elleng Jun 13 #32
There never, ever was "standing." Tarzanrock Jun 13 #35
Statement from President Joe Biden on Supreme Court Decision on FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine LetMyPeopleVote Jun 13 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS unanimously says t...»Reply #14