Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jmowreader

(53,474 posts)
21. In reality having a Democratic president and Congress is good for the GOP
Tue Jul 2, 2024, 01:37 PM
Jul 2024

The ideal setup as far as helping the GOP look good is about 45 percent in the House, around 42 percent in the Senate, no more filibuster and a Democrat in the White House. This is enough Republicans for them to get some of the things they want - most revolving around money for the red states - and they'll be able to go out to their voters and brag about all the great things they did for them. Think about Lauren Boebert or MTG going back to their districts and speechifying about all the money, which they voted against, that's flowing to their districts. The things some of their people REALLY want - like an absolute abortion ban, a balanced federal budget amendment, elimination of Social Security or Medicare, and turning the US into a Christian nation - won't ever get done, which is a good thing.

If you put a Republican majority in either house or a Republican in the White House, nothing gets done. I don't remember which one it was that said this, but I remember a fairly prominent Republican member of Congress complaining earlier this year that Congress really hasn't done anything this term - and that's because the only two things the GOP can do are stonewall and delay. (Which are synonyms, but that's okay; they don't want to be known for having done only one thing.)

But you make the GOP a permanent minority party, let them help steer money to things they value while allowing Democrats to fund things we value, and QUIT FUCKING CUTTING TAXES so we don't have to keep increasing our borrowing, and the country will eventually thrive.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Same as if trump fails to run. pwb Jul 2024 #1
No, it's not the same iemanja Jul 2024 #2
I dint mean it was the same. pwb Jul 2024 #3
Quote: "Same as if trump fails to run" iemanja Jul 2024 #5
You got me. pwb Jul 2024 #9
It absolutely happens to me. iemanja Jul 2024 #20
Those effin terrorists? malaise Jul 2024 #4
How are you doing malaise? mahina Jul 2024 #13
So now the Heritage Foundation has a say in who the DNC makes their candidate? ScratchCat Jul 2024 #6
This motherfucker Blue Cape Jul 2024 #7
How do they have standing? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2024 #8
It may be none of their business, but they have six like-minded friends on the Supreme Court. Lonestarblue Jul 2024 #15
Go fuck yourself, Mike Howell. orange jar Jul 2024 #10
They say that politics makes for strange bedfellows... Dpd174 Jul 2024 #11
It's none of their business. alarimer Jul 2024 #12
Heritage Found. may have been a major force in in this crisis delisen Jul 2024 #14
Given a lot of idiot magats think he's Jesus BlueKota Jul 2024 #29
Interesting. This sort of confirms that Biden being replaced is a good idea. honest.abe Jul 2024 #16
That's what Heritage would like us to think. jmbar2 Jul 2024 #17
Oh so its 4 dimensional chess. honest.abe Jul 2024 #19
More like Psyops dweller Jul 2024 #27
They can't dictate how parties handle their nomination process. And the process is well known. Renew Deal Jul 2024 #18
Maybe SCOTUS. Bucky Jul 2024 #24
In reality having a Democratic president and Congress is good for the GOP jmowreader Jul 2024 #21
There will be litigation is President Biden is not on the ballot LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2024 #22
Thank you! jmbar2 Jul 2024 #23
Here you are LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2024 #25
Thanks! jmbar2 Jul 2024 #26
So let's quit talking about replacing him and support Democrats. Qutzupalotl Jul 2024 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Heritage Foundation threa...»Reply #21