Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,047 posts)
14. The problem isn't Fox -
Wed Sep 18, 2024, 12:53 PM
Sep 2024

It is reporters (generally - not specific to Fox) not taking the time to understand legal concepts before they write the story. The same term is used in numerous versions of this story. When you grant someone permission to live in your space, they aren't squatters - and, depending on the law of the state, at some point you have to formally evict them in order to get them out. It makes no difference, in most states, if they are paying rent or not.

And, FWIW, that includes boyfriends/girlfriends - if you are the party on the lease/title and you let your partner stay with you, you should count on having to evict them if the relationship ends.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

THIS is fucking insane! North Shore Chicago Sep 2024 #1
I'll tell you how to deal with these people. If you are there you just happen to notice that the garage door has a flying_wahini Sep 2024 #2
That's what the temporary order is intended to prevent. marybourg Sep 2024 #5
This involves stupidity, not "squatters" ScratchCat Sep 2024 #3
I heard this on a radio show (not talk radio) and it's the best link underpants Sep 2024 #8
A Fox network affiliate station produced this story - not Fox News EYESORE 9001 Sep 2024 #9
The problem isn't Fox - Ms. Toad Sep 2024 #14
This is not a squatters rights situation. The facts are all wrong for a squatter. marybourg Sep 2024 #4
"Squatters rights" do not exist... ExciteBike66 Sep 2024 #6
Except that these people have no legal right to his garage. intheflow Sep 2024 #10
Under the law, the homeowner is a landlord. Ms. Toad Sep 2024 #15
So isn't he evicting them now? intheflow Sep 2024 #16
The article I read didn't say anything about him initiating a court action to evict them. Ms. Toad Sep 2024 #21
That's right. I have a friend who allowed a person Abolishinist Sep 2024 #17
Yup. Ms. Toad Sep 2024 #23
This guy was renting. He didn't own the home. underpants Sep 2024 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author Abolishinist Sep 2024 #20
It may mean he is in more trouble. Ms. Toad Sep 2024 #25
That us absurd. OLDMDDEM Sep 2024 #7
I would think a garage is prohibited as any kind of rental unit unless it was renovated chowder66 Sep 2024 #11
I was just thinking that myself-- in Michigan a garage wouldn't be approved for habitation, Jack Valentino Sep 2024 #27
Why did Spectrum install cable without checking with the property owner first? TheBlackAdder Sep 2024 #12
I don't know. The Toma guy was renting with his friends underpants Sep 2024 #18
According to the article, Toma was the owner. He did have several roommates as well. Abolishinist Sep 2024 #24
As I heard it on the radio he was renting underpants Sep 2024 #26
In a red stage !!!!!!!! Trueblue1968 Sep 2024 #13
My friend let her adult son stay with her in her house Marthe48 Sep 2024 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yikes. Squatters' rights?...»Reply #14