Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Snarkoleptic

(6,100 posts)
Sun Dec 15, 2024, 03:34 PM Dec 2024

"What is a woman?" Is often used as a mic-drop/own-the-libs question by magaloons. [View all]

As per usual, they have overly simple "my gut tells me" answers for complex questions.

A BlueSky Thread-
https://bsky.app/profile/christopher664023.bsky.social/post/3lahwh7u6rk2t

In 1890, the X and Y chromosomes were discovered. It was found that the men who were tested had 46 chromosomes, including an X and a Y, while women who were tested also had 46 chromosomes, including 2 X chromosomes.
So obviously the conclusion was that the Y chromosome defined masculinity.

A reasonable conclusion.
Fast forward 50 years... and it was found that some men had 47 chromosomes, including 2 X's and a Y, while some women had 45, including only one X. Still no problem with the "Y chromosome defines masculinity" idea.

Then... it was found that fully 1 in 300 men weren't 46,XY. Some women were. Oops. After DNA was discovered in the 50s, it was found that the SrY gene, usually found on the Y chromosome, sometimes was missing. And sometimes had been translocated to another chromosome, hence 46,XX men and 46,XY women

So SrY defined masculinity.
Then.. it was found out that some men didn’t have an SrY chromosome, not anywhere. Some women did. Other genes were involved. Worse, other factors, such as Androgen Insensitivity made 46,XY people female, and Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia masculinised 46,XX people.

Then in the 70s, other syndromes, such as 5alpha-reductase-2 deficiency were identified, which caused babies to look like one sex at birth, then the other at puberty. Worse, in some places 1 in 50 infants had this natural sex change, it was not rare there.

Science 1974 Dec 27; 186 (4170): 1213-5
In an isolated village of the southwestern Dominican Republic, 2% of the live births were in the 1970's, guevedoces....These children appeared to be girls at birth, but at puberty these 'girls' sprout muscles, testes, and a penis.

For the rest of their lives they are men in nearly all respects.
In the 90s, it was found that hormonal hiccups in the womb caused some parts of the body to develop as one sex, others as the other, regardless of genetics.

Male–to–female transsexuals have female neuron numbers in a limbic nucleus. Kruiver et al J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2000) 85:2034–2041. The present findings of somatostatin neuronal sex differences in the BSTc and its sex reversal in the transsexual brain clearly support the paradigm that in transsexuals sexual differentiation of the brain and genitals may go into opposite directions

It's a matter of timing during foetal development. Sometimes a boy is born looking like a girl, sometimes a girl is born looking like a boy, regardless of chromosomes.

This is complex stuff. We don't teach the Theory of General Relativity in grade school, Newtonian physics or at most Special Relativity (far simpler) is enough. Similary, "XX is female, XY is male" is good enough unless you do medicine or biology in college.

It's only really relevant when talking about Trans or Intersex people, just as Relativistic effects only become relevant in the domain of the very big, very small, or very very fast, close to 186,000 miles a second.

People do *not* need psychiatric help when they think that things get heavier, more massive, as they go faster... while lengths contract. People do *not* need help when they think their sex is something different from their genetics.

Intersex people exist. Trans people exist. They are unusual, so trying to apply the usual approximations is as silly as trying to apply Newtonian physics to things moving close to or at light speed. Legislating such things is as insane as legally ruling that Pi=3... as has been done in the past.

I hope this helps explain why I don’t base my opinions on 9th grade biology.

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thanks. Lol, I obviously missed a few developments since my 9th grade Biology in '61. Biophilic Dec 2024 #1
Right on! Snarkoleptic Dec 2024 #7
Thank you that was very interesting Walleye Dec 2024 #2
I forgot about that, but this is oh so common on the reich. Snarkoleptic Dec 2024 #8
thank you! excellent post! unblock Dec 2024 #3
Here's an article that needs to go viral. CrispyQ Dec 2024 #4
50 percent of people have below average intelligence and the average ain't that high either. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2024 #13
Wow, thanks for that ! Have you ever posted this as its own OP ? It needs to be more widely known. eppur_se_muova Dec 2024 #15
Not to decide is to decide... 3catwoman3 Dec 2024 #33
Fantastic post. How awesome that you and so many other fact-based, empathetic people are on DU. lostnfound Dec 2024 #5
Thanks LNF! Snarkoleptic Dec 2024 #9
K&R Solly Mack Dec 2024 #6
A friend of mine in high school was XXY. MineralMan Dec 2024 #10
they do't care about biology or chromosomes rampartd Dec 2024 #11
What an excellent and fascinating post. Reads like a charm. Bookmarked. . . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2024 #12
Great post. Bookmarking for future reference. nt boonecreek Dec 2024 #14
Last summer DENVERPOPS Dec 2024 #16
My kids are Gen Z, this issue is settled for them RainCaster Dec 2024 #17
Mine too.... Bettie Dec 2024 #18
That's why I was surprised that young folks migrated some towards Trump. Elessar Zappa Dec 2024 #19
None of my boys Bettie Dec 2024 #22
Excellent info, but... Orrex Dec 2024 #20
Ninth grade biology. Very nice. Iggo Dec 2024 #21
My question is this: ReRe Dec 2024 #23
ThankyouThankyouThankyouThankyou brakester Dec 2024 #24
O, I thought it was just an incel question. Nimble_Idea Dec 2024 #25
A woman is whatever she tells you she is. You can *ask*, not dictate. CousinIT Dec 2024 #26
Thank you for such an educating post. kimbutgar Dec 2024 #27
Two comments: Aussie105 Dec 2024 #28
The first woman was also the first transgender. keithbvadu2 Dec 2024 #29
who is the author? Kali Dec 2024 #30
Not sure but I found a version here at Proud To Be Trans In West Berkshire: progressoid Dec 2024 #41
Fascinating! I had no idea there were so many variations. liberalla Dec 2024 #31
KNR and bookmarking for this most informative OP. I don't have the information niyad Dec 2024 #32
I'd respond back with: A question asked by MAGA YouTube channel hosts who think impregnating underage girls is... Crowman2009 Dec 2024 #34
I did not know half of this. Thanks! n/t PatrickforB Dec 2024 #35
OMG 4catsmom Dec 2024 #36
Very interesting! people Dec 2024 #37
Answer: You come close. Sneederbunk Dec 2024 #38
I'm not on Bluesky Mme. Defarge Dec 2024 #39
It's not a trap I've ever fallen into. BannonsLiver Dec 2024 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"What is a woman?" Is of...