General Discussion

soldierant

(8,594 posts)

48. Multiple attornies have been addressing the possibilities all week.

Wed Jan 8, 2025, 12:32 AM

Jan 2025

Besides Joyce Vance, that includes Harry Litman and Ben Meisalas, and probably Michael Popk,Thoug I didn't look him, or Glenn Kirschner, up.

This from Joyce was posted Daturday night, and it's not presented as news, but as a discussion of possible outcome accorfing to New York law:

https://joycevance.substack.com/p/before-inauguration-sentencinghttps://joycevance.substack.com/p/before-inauguration-sentencing?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=607357&post_id=154103514&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0NTUzNjQ5OSwicG9zdF9pZCI6MTU0MTAzNTE0LCJpYXQiOjE3MzYwNDI2MTcsImV4cCI6MTczODYzNDYxNywiaXNzIjoicHViLTYwNzM1NyIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.czYJdpaHQ_eFnNDmS8jZ32pwReUmUkDN6TW9vupIw8o&r=r406r&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sundance1220

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Breaking [View all] malaise Jan 2025 OP

Off to SCOTUS we go. Sneederbunk Jan 2025 #1

This is a state court proceeding. Ocelot II Jan 2025 #10

Court of Appeals Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #33

There's no federal jurisdiction unless the case involves a federal statute Ocelot II Jan 2025 #35

Check news. Sneederbunk Jan 2025 #57

They raised a constitutional issue, even though it's a bogus one. Ocelot II Jan 2025 #58

And he can't appeal until he is sentenced malaise Jan 2025 #2

Please explain like I'm a golden retriever Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #3

OK. Lucky, go get the ball! That's a good girl. Let go of that ball! Stop slobbering on that ball! GreenWave Jan 2025 #6

Was that really necessary? Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #7

My brief research confirms it MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #12

I just read an article that said Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #15

Man, there's always a way MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #19

I think you meant SCROTUM. nt Frank D. Lincoln Jan 2025 #22

This is the NYS case with Judge Merchan for which a jury found him quilty of 34 felonies karynnj Jan 2025 #61

Don't know what Jack Smith MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #63

I do not believe that Garland (Barr jr.) wants anything made public. LiberalArkie Jan 2025 #28

Maybe not CatWoman Jan 2025 #18

Well, it did ME a lot of good. Attilatheblond Jan 2025 #26

I needed a laugh stollen Jan 2025 #32

might have been misinterpreted stopdiggin Jan 2025 #59

... orangecrush Jan 2025 #20

That's correct. More specifically, he can't appeal to SCOTUS until Ocelot II Jan 2025 #36

Thank you Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #38

Today's decision *only* denied the requested delay for the sentencing hearing. Ocelot II Jan 2025 #39

It's a State conviction, for nreaking a State law. soldierant Jan 2025 #46

So what? Bluetus Jan 2025 #45

Actually I am expecting an Unconditional Discharge - no penalty, but he is still a convicted felon, forever. soldierant Jan 2025 #47

Why can't I find anything about this online? Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #4

That's because you didn't look at the DU home page. It's there. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #16

I heard it on NPR this morning. Nt leftieNanner Jan 2025 #23

Yea, always ForgedCrank Jan 2025 #25

Multiple attornies have been addressing the possibilities all week. soldierant Jan 2025 #48

Thank you for this Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #50

And that's exactly why I subscribe to Vance and Litman on dubstack soldierant Jan 2025 #64

Multiple attorneys have ben discussing this all week. Not as news, but as an explanation soldierant Jan 2025 #49

Personally, I'd just as soon sentencing didn't happen now. Merchan has already said it won't involve any sanctions. Silent Type Jan 2025 #5

There is a train of nonsense from magats Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #8

Kind of like waiting on the long form birth certificate gab13by13 Jan 2025 #9

Now their train of thought will change to, "he was convicted of a 'crime' that carried no sanctions, he's still Prez." Silent Type Jan 2025 #11

Not just magats - "abatement ab initio" TommyT139 Jan 2025 #53

Thank for context Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #54

For sure... TommyT139 Jan 2025 #55

Recommended. H2O Man Jan 2025 #13

i just wish Garland MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author onecaliberal Jan 2025 #17

All I know is this angrychair Jan 2025 #21

Trump and his puppet lawyers giving me PTSD flash backs of the Manson trials Attilatheblond Jan 2025 #27

Trump will skip it and send the parking lot lawyer to do a remote appearance on his behalf. sop Jan 2025 #24

He HAS to attend Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #34

Yippee! Whoopie! Very exciting! liberalla Jan 2025 #29

He can't be there. He's a busy guy. tavernier Jan 2025 #30

He homegirl Jan 2025 #31

Ha malaise Jan 2025 #37

Oh yeah? tavernier Jan 2025 #40

Not likely malaise Jan 2025 #42

Not likely malaise Jan 2025 #43

Then Friday will be Fiddlelady11 Jan 2025 #41

If it goes to SCOTUS, this an easy one for them to refuse to hear Mblaze Jan 2025 #44

Adding this malaise Jan 2025 #56

Thank you Mblaze Jan 2025 #62

Will Trump Now appeal to Alito For A Stay? Nt DallasNE Jan 2025 #51

Out of all he was accused of Tickle Jan 2025 #52

I'm worried though. bluestarone Jan 2025 #60