Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Breaking [View all]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Breaking [View all] malaise Jan 2025 OP
Off to SCOTUS we go. Sneederbunk Jan 2025 #1
This is a state court proceeding. Ocelot II Jan 2025 #10
Court of Appeals Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #33
There's no federal jurisdiction unless the case involves a federal statute Ocelot II Jan 2025 #35
Check news. Sneederbunk Jan 2025 #57
They raised a constitutional issue, even though it's a bogus one. Ocelot II Jan 2025 #58
And he can't appeal until he is sentenced malaise Jan 2025 #2
Please explain like I'm a golden retriever Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #3
OK. Lucky, go get the ball! That's a good girl. Let go of that ball! Stop slobbering on that ball! GreenWave Jan 2025 #6
Was that really necessary? Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #7
My brief research confirms it MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #12
I just read an article that said Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #15
Man, there's always a way MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #19
I think you meant SCROTUM. nt Frank D. Lincoln Jan 2025 #22
This is the NYS case with Judge Merchan for which a jury found him quilty of 34 felonies karynnj Jan 2025 #61
Don't know what Jack Smith MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #63
I do not believe that Garland (Barr jr.) wants anything made public. LiberalArkie Jan 2025 #28
Maybe not CatWoman Jan 2025 #18
Well, it did ME a lot of good. Attilatheblond Jan 2025 #26
I needed a laugh stollen Jan 2025 #32
might have been misinterpreted stopdiggin Jan 2025 #59
... orangecrush Jan 2025 #20
That's correct. More specifically, he can't appeal to SCOTUS until Ocelot II Jan 2025 #36
Thank you Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #38
Today's decision *only* denied the requested delay for the sentencing hearing. Ocelot II Jan 2025 #39
It's a State conviction, for nreaking a State law. soldierant Jan 2025 #46
So what? Bluetus Jan 2025 #45
Actually I am expecting an Unconditional Discharge - no penalty, but he is still a convicted felon, forever. soldierant Jan 2025 #47
Why can't I find anything about this online? Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #4
That's because you didn't look at the DU home page. It's there. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #16
I heard it on NPR this morning. Nt leftieNanner Jan 2025 #23
Yea, always ForgedCrank Jan 2025 #25
Multiple attornies have been addressing the possibilities all week. soldierant Jan 2025 #48
Thank you for this Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #50
And that's exactly why I subscribe to Vance and Litman on dubstack soldierant Jan 2025 #64
Multiple attorneys have ben discussing this all week. Not as news, but as an explanation soldierant Jan 2025 #49
Personally, I'd just as soon sentencing didn't happen now. Merchan has already said it won't involve any sanctions. Silent Type Jan 2025 #5
There is a train of nonsense from magats Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #8
Kind of like waiting on the long form birth certificate gab13by13 Jan 2025 #9
Now their train of thought will change to, "he was convicted of a 'crime' that carried no sanctions, he's still Prez." Silent Type Jan 2025 #11
Not just magats - "abatement ab initio" TommyT139 Jan 2025 #53
Thank for context Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #54
For sure... TommyT139 Jan 2025 #55
Recommended. H2O Man Jan 2025 #13
i just wish Garland MadameButterfly Jan 2025 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author onecaliberal Jan 2025 #17
All I know is this angrychair Jan 2025 #21
Trump and his puppet lawyers giving me PTSD flash backs of the Manson trials Attilatheblond Jan 2025 #27
Trump will skip it and send the parking lot lawyer to do a remote appearance on his behalf. sop Jan 2025 #24
He HAS to attend Sundance1220 Jan 2025 #34
Yippee! Whoopie! Very exciting! liberalla Jan 2025 #29
He can't be there. He's a busy guy. tavernier Jan 2025 #30
He homegirl Jan 2025 #31
Ha malaise Jan 2025 #37
Oh yeah? tavernier Jan 2025 #40
Not likely malaise Jan 2025 #42
Not likely malaise Jan 2025 #43
Then Friday will be Fiddlelady11 Jan 2025 #41
If it goes to SCOTUS, this an easy one for them to refuse to hear Mblaze Jan 2025 #44
Adding this malaise Jan 2025 #56
Thank you Mblaze Jan 2025 #62
Will Trump Now appeal to Alito For A Stay? Nt DallasNE Jan 2025 #51
Out of all he was accused of Tickle Jan 2025 #52
I'm worried though. bluestarone Jan 2025 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking»Reply #51