Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes BoRaGard Feb 5 #1
MORE INFO - HuffPost Wicked Blue Feb 5 #2
About time. dalton99a Feb 5 #3
GOOD!! proud patriot Feb 5 #4
Will fetterman be there? Lunabell Feb 5 #5
He would love to but he has to pick up his suit (sigular) from the dry cleaners ..... nt kelly1mm Feb 5 #31
lol wolfie001 Feb 6 #58
They can stall it but they're not going to stop it. 😞 Jrsygrl96 Feb 5 #6
They should be making as much public noise... Think. Again. Feb 5 #7
Correct. Form over substance. Not nothing, but ultimately futile. nt kelly1mm Feb 5 #32
As Rachel or Lawrence said - they maybe thought Dems would easly fold. While they can't stop alot of stuff they Can... electric_blue68 Feb 6 #57
put a hold or block on it. nt msongs Feb 5 #8
It doesn't work that way. They are taking maximum action. tritsofme Feb 5 #9
There is no such thing as a block on a nomination Wiz Imp Feb 5 #30
I don't get it tinymontgomery Feb 5 #10
Holds don't block a nomination, they make it more painful. tritsofme Feb 5 #12
Thanks, just seems like they get away with everything. n/t tinymontgomery Feb 5 #37
Holds on individual cabinet nominees don't do much. Wiz Imp Feb 5 #35
Thanks for the response tinymontgomery Feb 5 #38
No problem. Before a few weeks ago, I didn't have a great understanding of how everything works either Wiz Imp Feb 5 #47
Didn't take it as negative, thank you for the info. n/t tinymontgomery Feb 5 #50
Thanks! Having a clear understanding... reACTIONary Feb 6 #59
Please call your Senators to vote NO on Vought. StarryNite Feb 5 #11
Good! More of this RESISTANCE please! 🙏 SunSeeker Feb 5 #13
Ah, an old-fashioned filibuster. malthaussen Feb 5 #14
Not a filibuster. Filibusters are not allowed for nominees Wiz Imp Feb 5 #45
A rose by any other name. malthaussen Feb 5 #49
Do it! More spine, please! calimary Feb 5 #15
Finally showing some backbone. Grumpy Old Guy Feb 5 #16
He's one of the fuckers who masterminded this shit. patphil Feb 5 #17
Do not bdamomma Feb 5 #18
Good! peggysue2 Feb 5 #19
ABOUT TIME!!!!! Clouds Passing Feb 5 #20
There are a growing number of floors requiring holding out there Magoo48 Feb 5 #21
It means a lot to the base for our leaders to be seen fighting back. Irish_Dem Feb 5 #22
We need to use every tactic to derail, delay and make them fight for every inch. hadEnuf Feb 5 #23
This is a good start but jgmiller Feb 5 #24
It's not a filibuster. Filibuster is not allowed on nominees. Wiz Imp Feb 5 #44
When does this begin? senseandsensibility Feb 5 #25
Good old-fashioned filibuster AverageOldGuy Feb 5 #26
Isn't/wasn't it the position of a majority of DU and many Democratic lawmakers that the filibuster is/was a kelly1mm Feb 5 #33
This is not a filibuster. The filibuster no longer is allowed for nominees. Wiz Imp Feb 5 #42
You and I know that. This is just the regular full time that each Senator is allowed to use in nominations. However kelly1mm Feb 5 #48
To be completely honest, I believe the filibuster should either be eliminated or restrictions placed Wiz Imp Feb 5 #52
Thanks for the detailed response. I am similar but come tom the other conclusion that the filibuster kelly1mm Feb 5 #54
I completely respect your position on this. Your reasoning is very logical. Wiz Imp Feb 6 #56
Not a filibuster Wiz Imp Feb 5 #43
This should have been Day One shit... EarthFirst Feb 5 #27
Yes Block Vought WyLoochka Feb 5 #28
Not possible to block. At best this will delay final confirmation by a day or 2 but it's still a good thing to do. Wiz Imp Feb 5 #41
And some were advocating for the end of the filibuster just a few years previous. egduj Feb 5 #29
This is not a filibuster. There is no filibuster allowed on nominees. Wiz Imp Feb 5 #40
They should include the gang of 3 misfits trying to get confirmed. FloridaBlues Feb 5 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan Feb 5 #36
FYI, they've had the cloture vote on Vought already and the vote was 53-47 Wiz Imp Feb 5 #39
Don't count on Bennett or Hickenlooper. nt Hotler Feb 5 #46
What about for RFK, Tulsi, and Kash? Polybius Feb 5 #51
Now that they've done this for Vought, I expect there's a good chance they will try it Wiz Imp Feb 5 #53
Thank you to the democrats showing gumption and fight. Shame on those that vote along side the fascist. nt Hotler Feb 5 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democratic senators will ...»Reply #16