Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(4,806 posts)
35. Holds on individual cabinet nominees don't do much.
Wed Feb 5, 2025, 07:20 PM
Feb 5

Can you name any Biden Cabinet nominees who were delayed significantly due to a hold placed by Republicans?

Tuberville's hold stopped nominations from moving forward because there were over 400 packaged together. To get past that hold would have required going through them one by one and allowing debate on each one which would have taken months of time which would have prevented them from doing more important things.

See the procedure for getting around a hold here (on an individual nominee it's not that complicated to get around it):

Note: I'll keep posting this until enough people see it and it sinks in that a hold on a cabinet nominee is not the magic pill many seem to think it is.

From the CRS (https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12200) :

In response to a hold, the Senate could choose to pursue consideration of a single nomination without
unanimous consent. The Senate can approve nominations using the cloture process in Senate Rule XXII.
The cloture process was designed to bring the Senate to a vote on a matter, even in the face of determined
opposition to having a vote. In recent years, the Senate has interpreted the cloture rule to require majority
support to end debate on a nomination, and also to establish that two hours is the maximum time for
debate on most nominations after cloture is agreed to.

Absent unanimous consent, the steps to confirm a nomination include:

• The Senate approves a non-debatable motion to proceed to executive session to take up a
nomination on the Executive Calendar. (Normally this motion is approved immediately
without a roll call vote—but with sufficient support, a Senator could secure a roll call
vote on this question. The motion requires a simple majority to pass.)
• The majority leader (or his designee) files cloture on the nomination. (The cloture motion
asks if the Senate wishes to bring debate to a close on the nomination.) Absent unanimous
consent to alter this “ripening period,” the Senate must wait two session days before
voting on cloture. The Senate can conduct other business during these two days, and
usually does.
• Two days of session later, the Senate votes on cloture. The vote is required to be a roll
call vote under the rule. If a majority of Senators voting support cloture, then cloture is
said to be invoked, and further consideration of the nomination is limited.
• The Senate conducts post-cloture debate on the nomination. For all but the highestranking nominations, the maximum time for consideration of a nomination after cloture is
invoked is two hours. Once cloture is invoked on a matter, the Senate can consider other
business during the post-cloture period only by unanimous consent.
• After post-cloture debate time expires, or when no Senator seeks to discuss the
nomination further, the Senate votes on the nomination. This can be by voice vote, but
with sufficient support a Senator could secure a roll call vote on the question of
confirming the nomination. The motion requires a simple majority to pass.
• To make the confirmation vote final, and in order to immediately return the approved
nomination to the President, the Senate routinely takes another parliamentary step by
unanimous consent. To prevent the possibility of a re-vote on the nomination, the Senate
tables (meaning, adversely disposes of) a motion to reconsider (a motion that would
allow a re-vote). (Absent unanimous consent, the Senate could vote to table the motion to
reconsider.)

The Senate often confirms nominations without unanimous consent by using the cloture process just
described. Confirming a large number of nominations using the cloture process could take considerable
floor time. The process can be somewhat expedited by filing cloture on multiple nominations on the same
day (sometimes referred to as stacking cloture motions). Cloture motions filed sequentially on multiple
nominations ripen simultaneously after the next two days of Senate session. Each nomination must still be
considered separately, however, which would usually mean two roll call votes (one on cloture and one on
confirmation, each approximately 15 minutes) and then up to two hours of debate time on each
nomination.



Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes BoRaGard Feb 5 #1
MORE INFO - HuffPost Wicked Blue Feb 5 #2
About time. dalton99a Feb 5 #3
GOOD!! proud patriot Feb 5 #4
Will fetterman be there? Lunabell Feb 5 #5
He would love to but he has to pick up his suit (sigular) from the dry cleaners ..... nt kelly1mm Feb 5 #31
lol wolfie001 Feb 6 #58
They can stall it but they're not going to stop it. 😞 Jrsygrl96 Feb 5 #6
They should be making as much public noise... Think. Again. Feb 5 #7
Correct. Form over substance. Not nothing, but ultimately futile. nt kelly1mm Feb 5 #32
As Rachel or Lawrence said - they maybe thought Dems would easly fold. While they can't stop alot of stuff they Can... electric_blue68 Feb 6 #57
put a hold or block on it. nt msongs Feb 5 #8
It doesn't work that way. They are taking maximum action. tritsofme Feb 5 #9
There is no such thing as a block on a nomination Wiz Imp Feb 5 #30
I don't get it tinymontgomery Feb 5 #10
Holds don't block a nomination, they make it more painful. tritsofme Feb 5 #12
Thanks, just seems like they get away with everything. n/t tinymontgomery Feb 5 #37
Holds on individual cabinet nominees don't do much. Wiz Imp Feb 5 #35
Thanks for the response tinymontgomery Feb 5 #38
No problem. Before a few weeks ago, I didn't have a great understanding of how everything works either Wiz Imp Feb 5 #47
Didn't take it as negative, thank you for the info. n/t tinymontgomery Feb 5 #50
Thanks! Having a clear understanding... reACTIONary Feb 6 #59
Please call your Senators to vote NO on Vought. StarryNite Feb 5 #11
Good! More of this RESISTANCE please! 🙏 SunSeeker Feb 5 #13
Ah, an old-fashioned filibuster. malthaussen Feb 5 #14
Not a filibuster. Filibusters are not allowed for nominees Wiz Imp Feb 5 #45
A rose by any other name. malthaussen Feb 5 #49
Do it! More spine, please! calimary Feb 5 #15
Finally showing some backbone. Grumpy Old Guy Feb 5 #16
He's one of the fuckers who masterminded this shit. patphil Feb 5 #17
Do not bdamomma Feb 5 #18
Good! peggysue2 Feb 5 #19
ABOUT TIME!!!!! Clouds Passing Feb 5 #20
There are a growing number of floors requiring holding out there Magoo48 Feb 5 #21
It means a lot to the base for our leaders to be seen fighting back. Irish_Dem Feb 5 #22
We need to use every tactic to derail, delay and make them fight for every inch. hadEnuf Feb 5 #23
This is a good start but jgmiller Feb 5 #24
It's not a filibuster. Filibuster is not allowed on nominees. Wiz Imp Feb 5 #44
When does this begin? senseandsensibility Feb 5 #25
Good old-fashioned filibuster AverageOldGuy Feb 5 #26
Isn't/wasn't it the position of a majority of DU and many Democratic lawmakers that the filibuster is/was a kelly1mm Feb 5 #33
This is not a filibuster. The filibuster no longer is allowed for nominees. Wiz Imp Feb 5 #42
You and I know that. This is just the regular full time that each Senator is allowed to use in nominations. However kelly1mm Feb 5 #48
To be completely honest, I believe the filibuster should either be eliminated or restrictions placed Wiz Imp Feb 5 #52
Thanks for the detailed response. I am similar but come tom the other conclusion that the filibuster kelly1mm Feb 5 #54
I completely respect your position on this. Your reasoning is very logical. Wiz Imp Feb 6 #56
Not a filibuster Wiz Imp Feb 5 #43
This should have been Day One shit... EarthFirst Feb 5 #27
Yes Block Vought WyLoochka Feb 5 #28
Not possible to block. At best this will delay final confirmation by a day or 2 but it's still a good thing to do. Wiz Imp Feb 5 #41
And some were advocating for the end of the filibuster just a few years previous. egduj Feb 5 #29
This is not a filibuster. There is no filibuster allowed on nominees. Wiz Imp Feb 5 #40
They should include the gang of 3 misfits trying to get confirmed. FloridaBlues Feb 5 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author MichMan Feb 5 #36
FYI, they've had the cloture vote on Vought already and the vote was 53-47 Wiz Imp Feb 5 #39
Don't count on Bennett or Hickenlooper. nt Hotler Feb 5 #46
What about for RFK, Tulsi, and Kash? Polybius Feb 5 #51
Now that they've done this for Vought, I expect there's a good chance they will try it Wiz Imp Feb 5 #53
Thank you to the democrats showing gumption and fight. Shame on those that vote along side the fascist. nt Hotler Feb 5 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democratic senators will ...»Reply #35