Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)

26. great!

Reply to ComplimentarySwine (Reply #19)

Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:31 PM

Dec 2012

so who designed the ones for home defense?

and why? what were their reasons for doing this?

how do you design a weapon for concealed carry?

why would a gun designed for target shooting shoot so fast? don't you have to aim at targets?

isn't every gun designed for target shooting? aren't you supposed to practice?

are there any designed for hunting that hold over 12? what do you hunt with them?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

there seems to be a semantics issue here concerning guns.new words might help.Offensive Weapons Ban [View all] farminator3000 Dec 2012 OP

farminator3000, you rock! tblue Dec 2012 #1

thanks! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #2

There are many pistols ComplimentarySwine Dec 2012 #3

why? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #17

Home defense, concealed carry, target shooting ComplimentarySwine Dec 2012 #19

great! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #26

Wow, that's a lot of questions. ComplimentarySwine Dec 2012 #29

thanks for the answers farminator3000 Dec 2012 #30

Better To Just Outlaw All Weapons And Then The Various Scenarios Become Irrelevant cantbeserious Dec 2012 #4

Because if they were outlawed, no one would have them. Kinda like weed. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #32

This may well be the stupidest post on the Internet today. PavePusher Dec 2012 #5

Tell us more Lordquinton Dec 2012 #6

For the life of me, I can't recall ever claiming expertise on the subject. PavePusher Dec 2012 #7

Then could you perhaps address the ideas proposed in the OP? Orrex Dec 2012 #9

Any weapon that can be used in defense can be used in offense, and vice versa. PavePusher Dec 2012 #13

The intent of a weapon is in the design Orrex Dec 2012 #14

and any gun that can commit mass murder in 30 sec or less farminator3000 Dec 2012 #22

no, but you said you were smarter than a post on the internet farminator3000 Dec 2012 #21

Haha, pulled that right out of your ass! xoom Dec 2012 #15

Thank you for warning us what was to come in your post... quakerboy Dec 2012 #10

ha! that's totally aweome! farminator3000 Dec 2012 #23

i doubt it why don't you keep looking farminator3000 Dec 2012 #18

do you expect me to agree with you? farminator3000 Dec 2012 #20

Yeah, there are some guns, JoeyT Dec 2012 #8

"people who aren't fighting a war (the public) don't need to have the same guns as soldiers." beevul Dec 2012 #11

That's a common Libertarian mantra, by the way Orrex Dec 2012 #12

What a great example billh58 Dec 2012 #24

Then by definition, the OP is selling a half truth as well. beevul Dec 2012 #27

The public has access to offensive weapons. Ron Green Dec 2012 #25

i figured it out for myself. try it sometime farminator3000 Dec 2012 #28

Kicking and recommending this because Ron Green Dec 2012 #16

thanks farminator3000 Dec 2012 #31