Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I could not have taken a100 dollar monthly tax hike [View all]TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)36. Good! We have to fund Social Security and it should have never been cut in the first place.
It is this exact line of reasoning that makes any tax cut a drown the government in a bathtub poison pill.
What is it you want government to do? How will you resource this mission?
A win from here would end the payroll tax and the Bush cuts and would accept the defense sequester but would turn it around a spend it for ten years on infrastructure while deleting the sequester on the spending side to start, while permanently taking the bottom bracket to about 8%.
Not that winning was a possibility.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Because the payroll tax cut was apparently the one tax cut they didn't want to extend/alter. n/t
W_HAMILTON
Jan 2013
#3
Not to defend Obama, but the payroll tax cut that was just ended was the same mistaken payroll tax
coti
Jan 2013
#25
Good! We have to fund Social Security and it should have never been cut in the first place.
TheKentuckian
Jan 2013
#36
To the rate that people have paid since the 1980s. It's worth it to have Social Security
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#12
I would have taken an 8% reduction in yearly income. Which would have meant me having to find
JaneyVee
Jan 2013
#5
I'm somewhat serious in the belief we may see tent cities of people living out of their vans
Kennah
Jan 2013
#21
Hey! We who are now retired used to pay those 1300 bucks a year more than you will pay.
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#13
I was told earlier that the $150-$200 that would probably leave each paycheck
alcibiades_mystery
Jan 2013
#10
Buy we did it. We did not have a lot of the things people have today -- cell phones, etc.
JDPriestly
Jan 2013
#22
time for the 1% to pay for Iraq and Afghanistan. shoulda listened to us. dipshits.
bubbayugga
Jan 2013
#27